Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Don Joe

Hey, joker, I also posted his ACU rating for the past year. I suggest you get a clue before you advertise your ignorance. It was 65%. That’s not as good as I’d personally like to see, but it’s about 60% better than Osamabama — who you’ll probably end up with if McCain loses.

As for “cain-bots,” you couldn’t be more wrong. McCain was essentially my last choice among Republicans. But I am wise enough to know that he is far better than either of the two top Dems. Apparently that’s more than I can say for you.


147 posted on 03/13/2008 11:52:05 PM PDT by RussP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies ]


To: RussP; RTO; Defiant; PA-RIVER; Man50D
Hey, joker,

Ah, still got the "bash 'em, smash 'em, make 'em cry and then they'll vote" Talking Points strategy paper, eh? LOL!

BTW, that's MISTER Joker to you, botsie.

I also posted his ACU rating for the past year. I suggest you get a clue before you advertise your ignorance. It was 65%.

*Yawn*... Of course, you hammered away with the Talking Point "lifetime ACU rating is 82% conservative" L/DL/S.

The Big Lie... repeat it often enough, and eventually it WILL be accepted as true.

Is that on the Talking Points too? Or do they just refer you to the traditional handbook for that proven-effective strategy?

But I am wise enough to know that he is far better than either of the two top Dems. Apparently that’s more than I can say for you.

Wrong, botaroma!

I agree that he's "better than" (code for "less evil than") the other two.

I also agree that arsenic is "better than" (i.e., "less evil than") strychnine. That doen't mean I'll be drinking any of it, though.

With sufficiently precise metrics, it's possible to tell the difference in atomic weight between two near-identical isotopes. That doesn't mean that a wise man will shout from the rooftops how dramatically different they are.

Yeah, your boyo ain't "as bad as" the other two. He's WAY over the "too bad to swallow" mark, though. I guess in YOUR world there aren't "absolutes" -- it's all relative. As long as one poison is even infinitesimally less toxic than the other, we're required to ingest it, since, hey, it's not AS bad.

And you call that "wise," LOL!

It's your kind of compromise, compromise, compromise that has gotten us to this point. Like a boa constrictor, which doesn't "crush" its prey, but merely takes up the slack each time the prey exhales, your brand of compromise, compromise, compromise has finally succeeded in getting us to the "no more air" point. Nice work, I hope you're proud of yourself, munchkin.

The left says "I've got a deal for you! You just give up a little bit -- each time. Just move a little to the left. To help you out with your suckers constituents, we'll call it 'compromise' -- 'moving to the middle.' That's all we ask -- just a wee l'il bit of 'compromise' each election cycle. To show you how reasonable we are, we'll accept your compromises! All you need to do is to get a little bit closer to our position each time around. Oh, and about the way WE keep moving more to the left? No problem. You just keep on compromisin' that's all we ask. Make us happy. Be 'bipartisan', you maverick, you!"

You have yourself a day, son.

157 posted on 03/14/2008 10:17:38 AM PDT by Don Joe (We've traded the Rule of Law for the Law of Rule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson