“”“our” guy, denouncing OUR President of the United States as not credible, a torturer, a human rights abuser, a polluter of the earth, and damaging to the world.””
“”One need not agree with McCain’s comments to say that an intellectually honest person wouldn’t characterize them as you did.””
Do you consider yourself an intellectually honest person?
If so, can you point to on time in the article that McCain defended our President?
I try to be, although I don't always succeed.
If so, can you point to on time in the article that McCain defended our President?
The point I was making, which is that r.o.s. characterized what McCain actually said, in terms which were clearly not supported by the words themselves.
Whether or not McCain defended the president or not, is irrelevant to that fact.
As I said: one need not agree with McCain's comments to recognize r.o.s's comments as intellectually dishonest.