I try to be, although I don't always succeed.
If so, can you point to on time in the article that McCain defended our President?
The point I was making, which is that r.o.s. characterized what McCain actually said, in terms which were clearly not supported by the words themselves.
Whether or not McCain defended the president or not, is irrelevant to that fact.
As I said: one need not agree with McCain's comments to recognize r.o.s's comments as intellectually dishonest.
Since we are on the same side here, I must comment that if I was trying to be dishonest I would not have posted his words and my words.
And make no mistake, we are on the same side, whether you or McCain want us or not.