Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Russian defense spending to grow 20% in 2008, to $40 bln
Ria Novosti ^ | 02/26/08

Posted on 02/27/2008 9:46:29 AM PST by TigerLikesRooster

Russian defense spending to grow 20% in 2008, to $40 bln

18:29 | 26/ 02/ 2008

MOSCOW, February 26 (RIA Novosti) - Russia's Defense Ministry will spend around one trillion rubles ($40 bln) of federal budget funds in 2008, 20% more than in 2007, a ministry official said on Tuesday.

"The Defense Ministry will spend a little less than one trillion rubles in 2008, which is about 20% more than last year," Deputy Defense Minister Lyubov Kudelina said.

She also said that in 2008-10, military spending would account for 15.5-16% of aggregate federal budget expenditure.

She said most of the funds would be spent on the maintenance of the armed forces, the procurement and repair of military hardware, scientific and research work, and construction.

The official did not say how much would be spent this year on the procurement of new military hardware, but last year's figure was over 300 billion rubles ($12 billion), 20% higher than in 2006.

Russia has downsized its Armed Forces to about 1.1 million personnel, but military spending has increased dramatically under President Putin. Defense spending is set to total 1.18 trillion rubles ($45 billion) by 2010.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Russia
KEYWORDS: defensebudget; rapidgrowth; russia

1 posted on 02/27/2008 9:46:33 AM PST by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

US is at, what, $450B?


2 posted on 02/27/2008 9:50:15 AM PST by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

“Russia has downsized its Armed Forces to about 1.1 million personnel”

Yeah, they must have, you hardly ever see them digging ditches along roads or picking up garbage anymore.


3 posted on 02/27/2008 9:52:41 AM PST by Siberian-psycho (An oppressed class which did not try to possess arms, would deserve to be treated as slaves." Lenin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

I have recently been flipping through Ardady Babchenko’s “One Soldier’s War in Chechnya.”

Pooty had better start thinking about spending some of that petro-wampum on a complete rebuilding of the Russian Army, a more dysfunctional organization can scarce be imagined. Things are even worse than in soviet days.

I don’t care how much he spends on new toys, you can’t field a modern, high-tech professional army on the backs of brutalized teenage conscripts. They have never had a “professional” army in the first place. Conditions are so horrific for conscripts that virtually no-one re-enlists after their two-year hitch. There is NO senior enlisted cadre in the Russian army.

Then there’s this little matter of Russia’s demographic collapse...


4 posted on 02/27/2008 10:00:31 AM PST by sinanju
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

They’re flexing their oil revenue ...


5 posted on 02/27/2008 10:04:43 AM PST by GOPJ (Do the editors of the L.A. Times realize that illegal immigration is, you know, illegal? Patterico)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinanju
Good points. Russian has fought a number wars by using human waves, and by trading land for time: wear down the enemy and eventually the tide will turn.

That works much less well in an era of modern mechanized forces (which can advance quickly over the land you just traded) and can easily decimate your poorly-trained, poorly-led human waves.

I would never discount any threat (and Putin is scary in his intentions) but Russia does seem to be something of a joke.

6 posted on 02/27/2008 10:07:55 AM PST by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine

And we worry about the russians?


7 posted on 02/27/2008 10:40:33 AM PST by Joe Boucher (An enemy of Islam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine
US is at, what, $450B?

Actually, we're at $700 billion+

8 posted on 02/27/2008 10:48:10 AM PST by gdani
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: gdani

Does $700B level, I assume, include the ‘temp’ Iraq spending? I thought the consistent, recurring budget was approx $1/2T.


9 posted on 02/27/2008 11:01:13 AM PST by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine
Does $700B level, I assume, include the ‘temp’ Iraq spending? I thought the consistent, recurring budget was approx $1/2T

The $500bn figure is only what the Pentagon is allocated & does not include money allocated for either war, or defense spending through other agencies such as the Dept of Energy, DHS & others.

As the lefties like to say, we spend more on our military than every other nation combined.

10 posted on 02/27/2008 11:07:00 AM PST by gdani
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: gdani
As the lefties like to say, we spend more on our military than every other nation combined.

OTOH, the unit cost of the SM-3 missile which hit the spysat last week cost about the same as the $10M budget for the original Star Wars movie in 1977.

11 posted on 02/27/2008 11:26:05 AM PST by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: sinanju
--Conditions are so horrific for conscripts that virtually no-one re-enlists after their two-year hitch. There is NO senior enlisted cadre in the Russian army.-- That's true. IIRC correctly, during the Soviet era (1980s figure) the reenlistment rate was 2 percent! Even in Tsarist times the Russian military was notoriously weak in NCOs, if only because the people who were literate back then were mostly nobles and therefore officers. This is why you had (maybe still have) lieutentants doing jobs that E-3s would do in the US military. --Then there’s this little matter of Russia’s demographic collapse...-- Yup. In a couple of generations, the population of the Russian Republic will drop from 150 million to 100 milllion if current trends continue. --petro-wampum-- Where is all that money going? Not to the average Russian on the street--he or she lives no better (maybe worse) than during Soviet times. There's stuff in the stores now, I guess, but only the elites and "mafiosi" can afford it.
12 posted on 02/27/2008 12:18:48 PM PST by paleorite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: gdani

Actually, we're at $700 billion+

I wonder what it'll be under Obama?

13 posted on 02/27/2008 12:25:47 PM PST by JZelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson