[dbehsman]

and I applaud Obama on his new opinion Congress’s role in the Schiavo case, which is based on constitutional law.

Really? Do you care to point out precisely where in the Constitution it says that a husband has the right to starve his wife to death? Can you please tell us where in the Constitution it says that in controversies involving life and death decisions, we should error to the side of death? Can you please tell us where in the Constitution it says what the IQ level of a person is before they loose their human rights?

I said it before, and I'll say it again. The real fact of the matter is the deathocrats wanted Terri dead so that they could show that they had power over Bush and the Christian community. The libertarians wanted Terri dead so that they could show that they weren't like Bush or the Christian community.

A woman was executed in one of the slowest and cruelest ways imaginable, just to score a cheap political point. The deathbots have just as much blood on their hands as does Michael Schiavo and George Felos. May God have mercy on their souls.

[fetal heart beats by 21st day]

What, still no answer? I didn’t get one either.

[BigSkyFreeper]

The libertarians wanted Terri dead so that they could show that they weren't like Bush or the Christian community.

The libertarians wanted her dead because they didn't want the federal and state government's again, setting a precedent of intruding on other people's lives.