Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Myrddin

Up until a year or two ago it was under very tight reign,

The farmer was generally assured that as long as he produced enough crops to keep food cheap, he wouldn’t be driven out of business. Importantly, he also had to agree not to produce too much. As long as he did that, he would be sent enough money to struggle on until the next year.

The consumer benefited because they got abundant, cheap food. The farmer benefited, because he wasn’t driven out of business.

Ethanol has thrown a monkey wrench into that system. Right now the farmer doesn’t need that government money. As a result, he’s free to produce as much as he wants, and sell it for much more than the government controlled system paid.

You post was a litttle confusing, are you suggesting that we continue the cheap food system, or try to force the farmers to work under the new system (the one with ethonal) by eliminating the farm programs ?


27 posted on 02/25/2008 6:35:20 AM PST by Balding_Eagle (If America falls, darkness will cover the face of the earth for a thousand years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: Balding_Eagle
Ethanol is only a "viable" option because the taxpayer is subsidizing it as well. I know because some of my former colleagues are standing up a new ethanol plant. They wouldn't even try if the government subsidies weren't part of the deal. I've been helping them by finding technology to boost the efficiency of the corn starch to sugar step.
28 posted on 02/25/2008 8:56:08 AM PST by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson