Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DennisR
Just remember that the current population of the earth could fit into an area the size of Texas - 35 people to an acre.

Hmmm... Does that acre have enough "fertility" to feed the 35 people living on it?

I seem to recall reading that feeding a family of four by subsistence farming takes more then two acres.

Regards,
GtG

43 posted on 02/24/2008 3:51:07 PM PST by Gandalf_The_Gray (I live in my own little world, I like it 'cuz they know me here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: Gandalf_The_Gray

Hm...you might be right, although you can grow a phenomenal amount of food on two acres of land. If you have to throw in cattle, that would increase the amount of land needed for grazing, of course.

I did not intend to insinuate that 35 people per acres was sustainable - did not make that clear, though. Just making that point that the world is a very huge place, and the area that humans populate is practically miniscule.


66 posted on 02/24/2008 9:23:09 PM PST by DennisR (Look around - God gives countless clues that He does, indeed, exist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson