Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Gandalf_The_Gray

Hm...you might be right, although you can grow a phenomenal amount of food on two acres of land. If you have to throw in cattle, that would increase the amount of land needed for grazing, of course.

I did not intend to insinuate that 35 people per acres was sustainable - did not make that clear, though. Just making that point that the world is a very huge place, and the area that humans populate is practically miniscule.


66 posted on 02/24/2008 9:23:09 PM PST by DennisR (Look around - God gives countless clues that He does, indeed, exist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]


To: DennisR
...although you can grow a phenomenal amount of food on two acres of land.

With petroleum products you can

69 posted on 02/25/2008 4:12:22 AM PST by ScratInTheHat (Don't like my immigration stance? I'm dyslexic. PC keeps sounding like BS to me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

To: DennisR
Just making that point that the world is a very huge place, and the area that humans populate is practically minuscule.

Not near as big as it seems though. Only about 13% of dry land is suitable for agriculture and intensive farming can go through fertile land in short order.

Regards,
GtG

74 posted on 02/25/2008 11:41:00 AM PST by Gandalf_The_Gray (I live in my own little world, I like it 'cuz they know me here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson