Posted on 02/24/2008 11:41:11 AM PST by SFC Chromey
In a ceremony that received virtually no attention in the American media, the United States and Canada signed a military agreement Feb. 14 allowing the armed forces from one nation to support the armed forces of the other nation during a domestic civil emergency, even one that does not involve a cross-border crisis.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
This is just another step to ending the United States. A North American Union is only stopped by Ron Paul and the Constitution. We must win the convention. McCain will loose to Clinton and she will install a North American Union in 2010. Get ready!
>Look at the positive side of that. You’ll be able to bribe your way out of trouble.<
For a whole lot less than what it costs now!
Let me guess... Corsi’s next column will claim that Canadians will be forced to pay in Ameros when driving on the Texas Trans Intercontinental Super highway, and “they” know that there will be rioting and so want to be able to call in the US army to “put down” citizens.
More red meat for those that see a black helicopter under every rock.
I see the Staged Moon Landing/Capricorn One crowd is still around
I am not exactly worried about the Canadian Armed Forces, as to a great extent they have already become an adjunct of our own armed forces. In matters of national defense, Canada is a de facto protectorate, an subarctic Puerto Rico. However, the precedent it sets could be dangerous. The thought of the Mexican Army patrolling Los Angeles, Dallas, or Houston in case of race riots is chilling. It is hard to imagine then not siding with their co-ethnics in conflicts with African Americans.
A scenario that should scare the hell out of everyone
LOL, ged ouda here...
Yep, you’re here alright. If you can’t see what’s on the drawing board, then you’re one of them.
The politicians within our government are constantly moving toward the erasing of our sovereignty. They know what they are doing.
When the time comes I hope there are still a few patriots willing and able to put an end to it all.
I see that you wrote 24 and 25. Bud, in certain ways they are contradicting of each other. You see the problem as it relates to Federales on our soil, and then seek to trash folks who also recognize that problem and what the larger picture is.
Can’t you see what direction we’re headed in, and that it isn’t good? Why expend your energy dumping on folks who would rather sound the alarm sounded now, than have to deal with something that is a week or two from becoming a reality?
“sound the alarm “
Shhhh, we’re not supposed to know.
Are you saying that Canada and the US did not just agree to some "Civil Assistance Plan"? If so, what evidence do you have that Corsi fabricated this?
Would you be comfortable with the US making the same kind of Executive agreement with Mexico? How about with China under a President Obama?
Oh dang, that was a Code 142263982 violation. Ooops...
Globalism ping...
more good news from the great white north, eh
I would be willing to support a party that is both Conservative and Nationalist. But I suggest you substitute another word for Nationalist, perhaps ‘Patriot’ or ‘American’. There are too many negative associations with ‘Nationalist’.
I think you misunderstood my post. I am mocking those who see something “nefarious” in this, i.e. a “black helicopter under every rock”. Corsi knows his readers are easily duped and don’t think for themselves.
The answer to your first question: No.
Corsi is the messenger, why attack him for telling us what the government refuses to report on itself or have Congress authorize?
Just because Corsi is the one who’s telling, because the liberal lamestream complicit media refuses, doesn’t make the AGREEMENT to merge forces go away or non-factual.
By that philosophy, whatever Corsi writes is fiction, even when it’s article about illegals in America about whom the liberal media more often either won’t name or, if they do, hides behind the verbage of “undocumented.”
Half of the time, Corsi manufactures slants on stories that are absurd. I don’t like being treated like some low-IQ imbecile that falls for any old crap that some guy needs to write just to be make a living. You make it out as if he always reports “facts”. NOT!
What has he reported that is a lie?
I would like to know that, thanks.
“I find it funny that this happened and the fact that every candidate for the White House is pro-amnesty and doesn’t support English as a national language. Welcome to the North American Union.”
Not every candidate is pro-amnesty. Ron Paul isn’t.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.