Why? Because we don't buy Sinclair's line of BS?
From what I've managed to glean from the various parts of the web (and those who have read the Globe story) Sinclair is dying from a brain tumor, he was institutionalized in a mental hospital suffering from acute schizophrenia, quite possibly at the time of the supposed encounter, has been a long term drug user, and has been convicted of fraud. Not exactly the most reliable witness to bank our election hopes on, right?
He claims to have an independent witness, but this so called driver has still not come forward (and never will, because he doesn't exist). Yes, he filed a law suit, but, guess what, anyone can file a lawsuit and cranks raise nuisance law auits all the time. It proves nothing. Note, he hasn't offered any proof of the charges of the claimed harassment either. Where are the phone records, the emails, the IM logs, or whatever? That is hard evidence, expect it probably doesn't exist either.
This is all the ravings of a sad, sick, dying man. I actually feel sorry for him, because I suspect in some ways he really does believe that his encounter with Obama happened. From what I have read, the MSM has already looked into it (do you really think they would pass up on a juicy story like this, even if it was one of their own?) and decided it simply doesn't pass the sniff test. In fact, it stinks to high heaven.
Face it. Without hard evidence or an independent witness, the only people who are going to believe there is merit to this story are those who wouldn't vote for him anyway. You saw the conservative reaction to the Times story when McCain was slimed. They rallied round and he managed to raise more money with one email than they had ever done before. Now, imagine the Obama supporters did the same thing. He would have more money than God pouring in, and with McCain already in a mess with the FEC, we can't afford that happening.
So, go ahead, slander us non-believers. Just don't come crying to us when it all backfires and it becomes an ugly mess for our side.
Why don’t we at least wait until tomorrow or Tuesday when Sinclair’s polygraph results are released. What will you say if both professional analysts say he is telling the truth? What if the limo driver is then brought public with a further damaging statement?
You argue as if you are an Obama supporter. I don’t yet accept that Sinclair is telling the truth, but I certainly won’t call him a liar until I see the evidence.
First of all, no one but a raving leftwing lickspittle would dismiss these allegations out of hand as if Obama was incapable o such lurid behvior.
2nd. gleaning from various parts of the web? Why don't you try listening to his story first. Because the "various parts of the web" have been using every conceivable angle to disprove the story, but have not even scratched it yet.
From what I have read, the MSM has already looked into it (do you really think they would pass up on a juicy story like this, even if it was one of their own?) and decided it simply doesn't pass the sniff test. In fact, it stinks to high heaven.
ROFLMAO. That is absolutely pathetic. You may need to stay off those leftwing websites for a bit and recalibrate.
Oh yes, and they are so reliable, aren't they? They printed a story about McCain with no evidence, but they won't print a story about a democrat with someone actually making a claim. Big difference.