Oh yes, and they are so reliable, aren't they? They printed a story about McCain with no evidence, but they won't print a story about a democrat with someone actually making a claim. Big difference.
Everyone is entitled to his or her opinion. I do find it strange that Sinclair’s story would seem like “garbage” to many. We know for a fact, Obama is an admitted coke user. There is no great stretch to believe this guy’s story is true.
It would indeed be a wonderful world if we were able to argue the issues alone during a political season, but this is not reality. We must fight like our enemies.
We are faced with possibly electing someone who is a stealth muslim/cokehead with many skeletons in his closet. I have no problem casting a more curious eye toward someones tawdry story if he passes a polygraph (yeah, I know polygraphs aren’t foolproof, but if that’s the case, why are they still used?).
As far as people thinking Freepers are “nuts”, well, I got some bad news for you: Our political enemies already think that and put forward that notion anyway....