Posted on 02/22/2008 8:30:34 PM PST by freespirited
Larry Sinclair wants to change the payout of our polygraph challenge and we've agreed. When he passes the test, he wants only enough money to pay off some outstanding debt of his mother's for Whitehouse.com to get the exclusive rights to the video and the results of the Polygraph.
He also wants $10,000 paid out to a couple of Minnesota charities: the Duluth Salvation Army Housing Loan Program and the Girls and Boys Club of Duluth. That seems perfectly reasonable to us the most penny-pinching of free spenders, and so we've agreed.
We'd like to note at this point that our fascination with Sinclair's claims doesn't have much to do with Barack Obama. We'd just as soon take on any other candidate, and, in fact, we already have.
To reiterate the statement we made before, WhiteHouse.com, nor any of it's staff are in any way affiliated with any of the presidential campaigns, we are in no way a subsidiary of or contractor for the CIA or any such organization, as has been suggested. We lay no claim to any ideological agenda; ours is to to seek out the truth in this story . Any suggestion to the contrary is conspiracy theory or wishful thinking or both.
Bump.
I thought he’d take all the money and blow it.
There is ALREADY more evidence here, than what the NY Slimes had against McCain.
This guy is not only very likely a fraud but he’s a moron. Take a ‘Reduced’ payout? Why? Guilt maybe?
Isn’t whitehouse.com a porno site though? Does not add to its credibility.
“When he passes the polygraph test”.
Buy popcorn futures everyone.
___________________________
Why?
Whoever defends the credibility of this freak will lose their own.
Is the dashing Larry Flynt behind this challenge?
Somewhere along the way whitehouse.com switched from porno to news.
Go figure.
Same difference most of the time.
How did you make this diagnosis?
Take a ‘Reduced’ payout? Why? Guilt maybe?
I can't speak for him, but my guess would be that he wants to avoid any appearance that his motive is financial.
Incidentally, I listened to him on the radio for an hour. He was not a moron at all. Intelligent guy.
Yep, it’s lowest of low to defend someone from Obama.
I just took a look and saw nothing remotely resembling porn.
A sperm burping gutter sl*t like sinclair is still 1000 times more credible than a marxist POS like Obama
Yes, they did. But DO NOT go to NASA.COM when looking for spae shuttle info. I’m still cleaning out my spam from that little mistake a few months ago.
We’ll all know next Tuesday who was right. :o)
Never mind, I just saw the previous thread...
Pissant you are back to making yourself look stupid again. Not matter who are what, he said she said BS is still BS. There is no evidence.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.