Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: y6162

Despite what he rejected afterward his reached his high status, you have just as much reason to accuse him of being a product of affirmative action. So does he belong on the Supreme Court or not?


33 posted on 02/22/2008 9:47:05 AM PST by Shade2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: Shade2

He sure does belong on the Supreme Court and he would have made it there despite Affirmative Action, not because of it.

Read he biography. It’s illuminating.

I reject the basis of your argument.


37 posted on 02/22/2008 9:51:41 AM PST by y6162 (b)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

To: Shade2; y6162

Thomas is a decent justice, but he’s not a first-class mind like Scalia. He obviously was chosen by Bush because the retiree was Thurgood Marshall.

Condoleeza Rice, on the other hand, seems sharp as a tack, and deserves her position regardless of race.

In other words, a successful black person, whether liberal or conservative, does not automatically owe everything to affirmative action. That’s one of the most sickening parts of affirmative action — the negative assumption it fosters about successful blacks. But people can still choose to overcome this bigoted assumption and judge people on their own merits.


39 posted on 02/22/2008 9:53:32 AM PST by BackInBlack ("The act of defending any of the cardinal virtues has today all the exhilaration of a vice.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson