Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BackInBlack
Part of the argument is that blacks like the Obama's are given a pass and treated as brilliant within the liberal cocoon, even if they are not. Many white liberals get the same pass, mouthing stupid cliches while being praised as gods among men.

The Obama's are both obviously quite bright and very articulate (a trait sorely lacking in most politicians of any ethnicity these days). But I would not say they are "brilliant," because "brilliance" requires some knowledge of the real truth and not just the ability to speak the same old cliches more dramatically.

24 posted on 02/22/2008 9:35:12 AM PST by pierrem15 (Charles Martel: past and future of France)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: pierrem15

If you are insisting that one can only be brilliant if he or she agrees with you, that’s obviously a silly argument. Heck, Karl Marx was brilliant; Proudhon was brilliant; Comte was brilliant. Heck, Bill Clinton was probably one of the naturally smartest guys to hold the presidency. That doesn’t mean they were right.

Obama is an exceptional writer, a gifted speaker, and displays an unusual amount of self-knowledge. Call it brilliant or not, but crying affirmative action is ridiculous. Obama should be opposed not because every black liberal is somehow by definition an AA baby, but because his liberal policies will lead to increased dependence on government, a perpetuation of the abortion holocaust, and a weak foreign policy.


34 posted on 02/22/2008 9:47:27 AM PST by BackInBlack ("The act of defending any of the cardinal virtues has today all the exhilaration of a vice.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson