[mware]

This just sealed the deal with me regarding McCain. I am so outraged at the innuendo. They just threw out a bucket of mud and hoped it stuck.

The New York Times may have done what McCain has not been able to do, unite Conservatives behind him.

[shadowgovernment]

“The New York Times may have done what McCain has not been able to do, unite Conservatives behind him.”
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>...........
gee just think how much we conservatives will support him when the Keating Five scandal comes back up? Or the suppression of intel on POW’s in Viet Nam
I can’t wait to see the support just ramp up when the Corp jet rides and SOROS funding come out.

IN YOUR DREAMS

[LadyNavyVet]

“The New York Times may have done what McCain has not been able to do, unite Conservatives behind him.”

Not the evangelicals, which McCain was already on shaky ground with. And he needs them to win, also.

[Swordfished]

This just sealed the deal with me regarding McCain. I am so outraged at the innuendo. They just threw out a bucket of mud and hoped it stuck.

The New York Times may have done what McCain has not been able to do, unite Conservatives behind him.

Where's the sarcasm tag? You gotta be kidding! This 'sealed the deal'?...because of your 'outrage'?! Hard to believe a liberal newspaper would try to harm a Republican candidate...never in a million years!

This story is irrelevent to the many reasons NOT to vote for McCain. You're outrage sounds phony. Vote third party.

[A2J]

The New York Times may have done what McCain has not been able to do, unite Conservatives behind him.

Huh?

If the NYT came out with a story that painted McCain as a saint, it wouldn't unite the conservatives behind him.