Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

For McCain, Self-Confidence on Ethics Poses Its Own Risk [McCain had an affair?]
New York Times ^ | February 21, 2008 | JIM RUTENBERG, MARILYN W. THOMPSON, DAVID D. KIRKPATRICK and STEPHEN LABATON

Posted on 02/20/2008 4:49:57 PM PST by Wallaby

Edited on 02/20/2008 5:05:45 PM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]

Early in Senator John McCain’s first run for the White House eight years ago, waves of anxiety swept through his small circle of advisers.

A female lobbyist had been turning up with him at fund-raisers, in his offices and aboard a client’s corporate jet. Convinced the relationship had become romantic, some of his top advisers intervened to protect the candidate from himself — instructing staff members to block the woman’s access, privately warning her away and repeatedly confronting him, several people involved in the campaign said on the condition of anonymity.

When news organizations reported that Mr. McCain had written letters to government regulators on behalf of the lobbyist’s clients, the former campaign associates said, some aides feared for a time that attention would fall on her involvement.

Mr. McCain, 71, and the lobbyist, Vicki Iseman, 40, both say they never had a romantic relationship.


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bimboeruption; drivebymedia; goebbelsmann; iseman; liberal; liberalsmear; liberalvalues; mccain; mccainhassers; newyorktimes; nyslimes; nyt; nythitjob; rino; slimes; vickiiseman
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 581-600601-620621-640 ... 981-990 next last
To: jwalsh07

My view: This “story” is designed to change the story from Michelle Obama’s visceral anti-Americanism.

Also, a historical note: in 1960, Bill Lawrence of the New York Times was simultaneously reporting on Senator Kennedy’s campaign and serving as an adviser to the Kennedy campaign.


601 posted on 02/20/2008 7:41:22 PM PST by Aln in Eastern WA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SharpTalons

I repeat from the NYT Comments section: (A comment and opinion I relate to;)

Wait a second - even if this is true, and it sounds pretty vague, I thought we all stopped worrying about cheating spouses with Bill Clinton? How can it be okay for Bill but not for McCain? McCain never came out of church with a ten pound bible in his hands. This is shoddy journalism. I am not a McCain fan. I wanted Rudy. But it’s amazing to me how the NY Times can be counted on to find some piece of slime, whether substantiated or not, and fling it rightward over and over again. Screw this sickening turn in journalism. This just makes me determined to vote McCain in November.

— MariSimone, Las Vegas


602 posted on 02/20/2008 7:41:23 PM PST by Richbee (Why is modest warming any cause for alarm and the ALARMISTS?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 569 | View Replies]

To: Wallaby
Didn’t the Times endorse McCain while sitting on this story?
603 posted on 02/20/2008 7:41:31 PM PST by CaptainK (...please make it stop. Shake a can of pennies at it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 527 | View Replies]

To: MARTIAL MONK

He got rebuked by the ethics committee for his “bad judgement”.

PERIOD.

PERIOD AGAIN.

...how soon they forget.

The American public would not think that as being “exonerated”.

Or are you one of those people who think the American people are stupid?


604 posted on 02/20/2008 7:41:32 PM PST by Fishtalk (If you liked the above post, remember I've got a Blog you might like to visit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 592 | View Replies]

To: jpf

McCain has made integrity the central theme to his campaign.
If his credibility on that is lost, then he has nothing.
This is the question the GOP will be facing even with the appearance of impropriety.


605 posted on 02/20/2008 7:41:44 PM PST by counterpunch (For the good of the party, McCain must step aside)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 518 | View Replies]

To: mom-7

Maybe Cindy had a stroke over Vicki. Cindy was awfully young to have a stroke bk then.


606 posted on 02/20/2008 7:43:14 PM PST by floriduh voter (FL Gov. Crist "This is America. I can wear whatever I want. I believe in freedom." You go, girl.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: keepitreal

I still don’t see the payoff for McCain???

Contributions from paxson?


607 posted on 02/20/2008 7:43:41 PM PST by Richbee (Why is modest warming any cause for alarm and the ALARMISTS?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 597 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Given the alternatives, I certainly hope so.


608 posted on 02/20/2008 7:43:41 PM PST by twigs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 386 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
This is why I supported McCain sooner rather than later. I knew this shit was coming. The filthy bastards at the New York Times and MSNBC are the slimiest scumbags ever to trod the Earth. A vote against McCain is a vote for Obama and these sleazy left wing bastards.

That's the way I'm feeling about it right now.

Want to feel better about supporting McCain? Say "Barack Hussein Obama, Commander in Cheif of the US military" seven or eight times.
609 posted on 02/20/2008 7:43:52 PM PST by Antoninus (How did you come to Barack?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: counterpunch

‘McCain has made integrity the central theme to his campaign.’

Ah, WRONG, McCain has made IRAQ the central theme of his campaign.


610 posted on 02/20/2008 7:44:14 PM PST by jpf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 605 | View Replies]

To: SharpTalons
Can I trust someone who keeps typing “wether”?
611 posted on 02/20/2008 7:44:27 PM PST by CaptainK (...please make it stop. Shake a can of pennies at it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 569 | View Replies]

To: CaptainK

Yup.....they sure did.


612 posted on 02/20/2008 7:44:32 PM PST by Cold Heat (NO! (you can infer any meaning you choose))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 603 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
See, I do not doubt it was horribly difficult and I thank every single prisoner of war that has ever defended our country from her enemies. I just have a problem with defining it as heroism. Honestly I have no intention of lessening the honor of serving, especially in a prison camp. But to call someone a hero just because they were captured is not only not honest, it is self-defeating.

We don't call those 6 million Jews in concentration camps heroes. It's just not the right word. They were victims and the people who got them out were heroes. It doesn't lessen the horror of their experience to not call them heroes. It's just wrong to use the wrong word. They were strong. They were survivors. Some of them probably were heroes during the ordeal in that they did heroic things to save others. But being in a prison camp doesn't make a person a hero. It's just the wrong word usage.

613 posted on 02/20/2008 7:44:39 PM PST by The Ghost of FReepers Past (Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 578 | View Replies]

To: Richbee

Republicans are supposed to maintain the moral high ground. Who cares what the soulless dems do? Since when are they relevant?

I apologize if I displace anger, but McCain really draws my ire.


614 posted on 02/20/2008 7:45:25 PM PST by SharpTalons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 602 | View Replies]

To: keepitreal
So how is it that lord McCain chairman of the Commerce committee never learned anything about the economy?
615 posted on 02/20/2008 7:45:25 PM PST by Just mythoughts (Isa.3:4 And I will give children to be their princes, and babes shall rule over them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 597 | View Replies]

To: Aln in Eastern WA
You could be right. I'm sure they have a dossier just like they had on Bush and they're MO in 2000 and 2004 was to release this or that little smear every time Kerry or Gore stuck their ample feet in their ample mouths.

But this may backfire bigtime. The SLimes and Keith Overbite may have just done what McCain could not, unite a sizeable portion of the base behind McCain. Murphy's law is a wonderful thing.

616 posted on 02/20/2008 7:45:30 PM PST by jwalsh07 (Obama, the King of Hope-a-Dope)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 601 | View Replies]

To: Richbee

Who knows.

Old-fool-itis?


617 posted on 02/20/2008 7:46:00 PM PST by keepitreal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 607 | View Replies]

To: keepitreal
In late 1999, McCain wrote two letters to the FCC urging a vote on the sale to Paxson of a Pittsburgh television station.

IIRC, that station in PIttsburgh was WQEX(16), a public sister station of original PBS affiliate WQED.

I think it was held up because lefty PBS supporters didn't want to set a precedent of having a cherished PBS station being sold to a private company. It was held up in litigation for may years by the lefties.

618 posted on 02/20/2008 7:46:17 PM PST by Dane ("Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall" Ronald Reagan, 1987)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 597 | View Replies]

To: yield 2 the right
Bye bye McCain, this is the bombshell that will destroy McCain, it is allover for the GOP this election, the only question is will it be Hillary or Obama now the McCain is 100% finished....

Please. If this is the best they got, it's not good enough. Both parties say there was no romantic entanglement. A Jennifer Flowers scandal this ain't.
619 posted on 02/20/2008 7:46:21 PM PST by Antoninus (How did you come to Barack?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: keepitreal

> Quoting the WaPo: McCain’s campaign denied that Iseman or anyone else from her firm or from Paxson “discussed with Senator McCain” the FCC’s consideration of the station deal. “Neither Ms. Iseman, nor any representative of Paxson and Alcalde and Fay, personally asked Senator McCain to send a letter to the FCC regarding this proceeding,” the campaign said.

O.K., let’s see if the media can find a money trail, or soemthing wrong in this Brouhahahaha.


620 posted on 02/20/2008 7:46:24 PM PST by Richbee (Why is modest warming any cause for alarm and the ALARMISTS?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 597 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 581-600601-620621-640 ... 981-990 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson