[nicmarlo]

A vote for McRino is a false mandate for McShamnesty, for McRino-Feingold, and for a host of other LIBERAL agendas.

[gridlock]

A vote for McRino is a false mandate for McShamnesty, for McRino-Feingold, and for a host of other LIBERAL agendas.

And what is a vote for Obama? Or Hillary?

If you and a friend of yours go and vote for some third party loser, how does the effect of that differ than if one of you went out and voted directly for the Democrat instead of McCain?

Do you think anybody is going to listen to your little "message"?

[PhilDragoo]

Obama eclipses Clinton as the likely opponent of McCain. McCain claims to have realized the importance of border security but cannot then rationalize Juan Hernandez as his point man on Mexico.

McCain admits he lacks economics understanding and has a record opposing the tax cuts which are the primary economic stimulant.

McCain promises to impose a crushing regulatory burden in service to the obscene fraud of "global warming".

Most significantly for the current electorate, McCain is a career Washington insider from the minority party who appears old and inarticulate opposite the young and charismatic "outsider".

That Obama is a stealth Muslim, Alinsky acolyte, who associates with the likes of Wright, who sends his Brzezinski to Damascus to suck up to the murderous Assad will be lost on most--and McCain will not broach any but the most Marquess of Queensbury matters.

McCain will lose handily no matter what individuals of conscience may do.

The situation might be ameliorated with a vice president of the caliber of Bobby Jindal, not those mentioned thus far, e.g., the mannikin in the closet with the tan from the bottle, or Lindsey of the Ultralight Loafers.

There will be a conservative president at some point with a congress more concerned with the constitution than the climate or the welfare of the criminal invaders and terrorist detainees.

Accounts will be settled.