Posted on 02/19/2008 6:22:13 PM PST by jern
CNN
Wow.
Calvin Coolidge’s wife, Grace Goodhue Coolidge, recounted that a young woman sitting next to Coolidge at a dinner party confided to him she had bet she could get at least three words of conversation from him. Without looking at her he quietly retorted, “You lose.”
But many are educated enough to know they don't want another clintoon in the WH it seems.
Eight years of the clintoons was an education. A bad education to be sure. But enough so that many do not want a "replay",
Just sayin'.....
Just wait until he makes her Attorney General. You ain’t seen nothin yet.
What a smooth talker.
Get Hillary while she's in your sights. Remember, a dead bird in your hand is worth two in the bushes.
FNC just cut off hillary, times are changing folks :)
_________________________
Everone is sick of her and sick of Bill. Liberals are sick of these awful people
but now we got to listen to the other socialist recycle a speech.
As someone said (no plagiarism here), "How do you run against hope?"
I disagree. While I believe in the Electoral College I have no problem with states like Maine that award via Congressional district.
Now of course this is a primary season but if the Republicans didn't have a winner-take-all format for so many contests then we would have seen a continued battle that McCain never would have survived. The winner-take-all format, when split among multiple candidates, allows for manipulations/deals such as we saw in WV. Nominations should be hard to achieve - not easier. The threshhold for number of delegates one would need to win the nomination would have to be lowered but I like to see a better representation of the party's support spread out. It allows the eventual winner to tailor their message to those concerns raised and at the same time seems to allow a more representative view of the depth of conservative opinion. Fred and Duncan could have very well still been in the mix until Super Tuesday and beyond. Candidates would still be cutting out but their totals would better reflect their success and failure.
But again the Electoral College is a little different because then essentially only two candidates are in the hunt and the whole idea of winner-take-all has a better application. Still imagine if , say, California, was not always a surefire win for Dems but was split up (and yes visa-versa)?
Hill has lessons in abusing power at Bill’s feet,,she would be more dangerous in that respect but she is not the unknown that obama is. Either he will be so bad, he would be a one termer or worse.
I don’t know but I know it is deeply satisfying to see that mean white woman defeated.
That’s just about the best post I’ve ever seen on FR.
Oh my God, GET HER OFF THE STAGE. Typical Clinton gabs on and on and on and on but she has NONE of Billy’s speaking skills. Democrats are against torture? They should be for a Ban on Hillary ever speaking in public again.
This is just gastly
I would agree with you about educated enough NOT to elect a Clinton but they are listening to anything right now that sounds like cum ba ya. (spell?)
“...think carefully...”
wrong website
Hillary will soon join Huckabee as irrelevant losers who are still running.
With SEVEN percent reporting:
Obama - 55%
The Beast 44 %
I think that Hillary had a high school gym half-full of sleepy seniors.
The one thing I can’t and won’t miss... Hillary’s ultimate and final concession speech.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.