Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Window to Open for Satellite Shoot-Down, Gates to Issue Order
American Forces Press Service ^ | Donna Miles

Posted on 02/19/2008 4:30:22 PM PST by SandRat

WASHINGTON, Feb. 19, 2008 – The anticipated landing tomorrow of the space shuttle Atlantis will open the window of opportunity for the U.S. military to shoot down a dying intelligence satellite headed toward Earth, Pentagon Press Secretary Geoff Morrell said today.

President Bush has authorized Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates to give the shoot-down order, and the secretary received a briefing on the plan today, Morrell said. The secretary is prepared to make that call from the road, if necessary, during his nine-day, around-the-world trip that begins tomorrow, he said.

Marine Gen. James E. Cartwright, vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told reporters last week the window of opportunity for shooting down the satellite would last seven or eight days.

“We have a pretty wide aperture with which to take this shot,” Morrell said today. “I think the commanders that are evaluating this are looking at all the conditions that could impact this to make sure that when we do take this shot, it can be as successful as possible.”

Cartwright, Air Force Gen. Kevin P. Chilton, commander of U.S. Strategic Command, and other experts across the military and U.S. government “are evaluating the situation and will advise the secretary when they have a shot to take,” Morrell said.

Pentagon officials began studying the situation in early January when it become clear that a malfunctioning U.S. spy satellite could cause death or injury if it fell in a populated area. Of particular concern is that the satellite could release hydrazine, a toxic chemical used as a maneuvering fuel.

A Pentagon plan was put together to strike the incoming satellite just above the atmosphere, rupturing the hydrazine tank in the process.

All systems appear to be “go” for the launch order. The Navy has prepared for the mission by modifying three SM-3 missiles aboard Aegis ships to strike the satellite, Cartwright said last week.

The international community has been informed of the mission and why it’s being conducted, Morrell said. “So I think everybody is up to date on what our thinking is and what our course of action is going to be, and we will keep them apprised of how it develops over the coming days,” he said.

The Federal Aviation Administration today issued a 24-hour notice warning aircraft and ships to steer clear of the projected shoot-down zone in the Pacific. New warnings will be issued every 24 hours during the anticipated shoot-down window, Morrell said.

The Pentagon will issue a written statement within an hour of the launch and will hold a news conference regarding the effort within the following hours, Morrell told reporters. “We can probably tell you at that point whether or not there has been an intercept,” but not necessarily if it destroyed the fuel tank, he said. “That may require some additional time,” he acknowledged.

Cartwright and other commanders associated with the mission “have a high confidence this engagement will indeed be successful, and I think Secretary Gates shares that confidence,” Morrell told reporters.

Morrell emphasized that the mission isn’t designed to test U.S. anti-satellite capabilities. “We did that in 1985. Been there, done that,” he said.

“This operation is designed to alleviate a threat to human beings on this planet. There is a large tank of hydrazine fuel onboard that satellite that would pose a significant threat to people within the immediate vicinity of it if it were to hit land,” Morrell said. “So not wishing to take that risk, the president has asked -- ordered -- this department to shoot down that satellite.

“And that is what we are now evaluating,” he continued, “and that is what the secretary will decide to do, based upon the advice of the commanders.”


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: faa; missiledefense; order; satellite; secdef; shootdown; shuttleatlantis; usmilitary
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

1 posted on 02/19/2008 4:30:25 PM PST by SandRat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SandRat

would be very cool to see this.


2 posted on 02/19/2008 4:31:01 PM PST by the invisib1e hand (unavailable for comment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the invisib1e hand

wait! why don’t we get alquayda to fly a plane into it?


3 posted on 02/19/2008 4:31:29 PM PST by the invisib1e hand (unavailable for comment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

Shuttle’s gotta land first, otherwise they’ll kill 7 astronauts right off the bat. Not to mention in 30 years when someone gets hit by the orbital debris caused by this.


4 posted on 02/19/2008 4:32:44 PM PST by AntiKev (Von nichts kommt nichts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

Watch closely, China. Pay attention, Putin.


5 posted on 02/19/2008 4:36:16 PM PST by neodad (USS Vincennes (CG 49) "Checkmate Cruiser")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat
Would the Boeing Airborne Missile Defense aircraft be a prudent backup?

Zap it!

6 posted on 02/19/2008 4:36:51 PM PST by Young Werther (Julius Caesar (Quae Cum Ita Sunt. Since these things are so.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neodad

remember to tell the same to Aww-Dimwited-Job in Iran and the Chia Pet in N. Korea.


7 posted on 02/19/2008 4:39:12 PM PST by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: AntiKev
Shuttle’s gotta land first, otherwise they’ll kill 7 astronauts right off the bat.

This is the part I don't understand. Space is a huge place, I can't believe that shooting at a satellite could in any way endanger our astronauts.....
After all it's not as if they are even in the same orbit.

8 posted on 02/19/2008 4:42:11 PM PST by Politically Correct (A member of the rabble in good standing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Politically Correct

Close enough...the satellite is in about a 58 degree orbit from what I’ve heard, and the shuttle is in a 56 degree orbit. How about that huh?


9 posted on 02/19/2008 4:48:45 PM PST by AntiKev (Von nichts kommt nichts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Politically Correct
After all it's not as if they are even in the same orbit.

As Anti-Kev noted, only a 2 degree difference. And Atlantis might have to descend through a potential debris field if they don't land first.

10 posted on 02/19/2008 4:52:24 PM PST by buccaneer81 (Bob Taft has soiled the family name for the next century.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

What is Hitlery’s and Obama’s flight schedule?


11 posted on 02/19/2008 4:52:37 PM PST by Man50D (Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

This is neat. I hope someday we get to see a video of it (after the security clean-up, of course).


12 posted on 02/19/2008 4:53:12 PM PST by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Young Werther
Zap it!

It's kind of big for that, 5,000 lbs they say, and the size of a school bus. Not some dinky little warhead. The think is going 17,000 mph. The kill vehicle won't be going that fast, but it will not be going in the same direction either, and should have a component in the opposite direction. At 17,000 mph, you could hit it with a water balloon and get a spectacular effect.

13 posted on 02/19/2008 4:53:26 PM PST by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: El Gato
At 17,000 mph, you could hit it with a water balloon and get a spectacular effect.

Not if it's filled with helium! ;O)
14 posted on 02/19/2008 4:56:14 PM PST by Man50D (Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: El Gato
At 17,000 mph, you could hit it with a water balloon and get a spectacular effect.

Not entirely obvious to this observer.

What happens when that hit-to-kill interceptor hits a solar panel out at one edge of the thing, punches a hole in it and the whole thing continues merrily on its way?

15 posted on 02/19/2008 4:58:26 PM PST by CurlyDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Politically Correct

what if the missile doesnt engage? and is floating around up there?

http://bp3.blogger.com/_MTE3roZy35A/R7rpWts9O3I/AAAAAAAACGQ/tc0edOWG8b4/s1600/USA%2B193%2BRevised_Target0330GMT.gif

here you go....load that .gif


16 posted on 02/19/2008 5:01:32 PM PST by BurbankKarl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: AntiKev
Close enough...the satellite is in about a 58 degree orbit from what I’ve heard, and the shuttle is in a 56 degree orbit. How about that huh?

So? I doubt very much they are in the same plane. There is a whole sheaf of orbits of any particular inclination. They would form a cone whose half angle is 90 minus the inclination. In this case about 33 degrees. Thus the orbits could actually be in different planes as much as 66 degrees apart. The shuttle is lower too.

But in any event, the shuttle is coming down. They've already undocked from the station. The station will remain in orbit, with that same inclination too. The station crew will be fine.

17 posted on 02/19/2008 5:03:18 PM PST by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: CurlyDave
What happens when that hit-to-kill interceptor hits a solar panel out at one edge of the thing, punches a hole in it and the whole thing continues merrily on its way?

The interceptor may deploy it's own "catcher" to increase it's effective area. But if somehow it just clips a solar panel (which on this bird is apparently only partially deployed at best, remember the bird died shortly after launch), then they'll try again tomorrow. Or maybe much sooner depending on where the destroyer with the backup interceptor is at. The impact would tend to make the satellite tumble and would also probably result in a faster decaying orbit.

18 posted on 02/19/2008 5:08:06 PM PST by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: BurbankKarl

I’m getting an FBI interdiction warning when I try to load that GIF.


19 posted on 02/19/2008 5:10:25 PM PST by steve86 (Acerbic by nature, not nurtureā„¢)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: BurbankKarl
what if the missile doesnt engage? and is floating around up there?

If it misses, it will come right back down in the north pacific. It will not achieve orbit. it's only on a suborbital trajectory. Just like Alan Shepard and Gus Grissom were way back when I was in 5th grade, (or the summer after in Grissom's case).

20 posted on 02/19/2008 5:12:11 PM PST by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson