Posted on 02/19/2008 11:46:19 AM PST by HD1200
We're not ready to share all the details about our upcoming evening lie-detecting with Obama accuser Larry Sinclair, but there are a few things that we want to tell you – namely that we've agreed on a time and place to carry out our wager with Mr. Sinclair.
We're going to meet him on Tuesday, February 26th at a undisclosed location in New York City. We've picked a polygraph expert, too: a renowned expert who has been involved in quite a few high-profile cases who we're not going to name until the results are not only in, but have been verified by a second renowned expert..
Then, we'll post the results, the names of both polygraph experts, and other relevant information, along with video and pictures, here on Whitehouse.com. Since the outcome of the test will be vital interest to the voting public, our findings will be made available before the presidential primaries in Texas and Ohio slated for March 4. That's all for now, but check back for updates
that may help him beat hillary, but not McCain.
My feeling is that it's best for America that this be resolved as soon as possible, either way.
We’ve picked a polygraph expert, too: a renowned expert who has been involved in quite a few high-profile cases who we’re not going to name until the results are not only in, but have been verified by a second renowned expert.. ..........Ah, Yes, and both are close relatives of Hillary. (per an un-mamed source of course... ;^))
I see no reason to assume that the Clintons are involved in this. Not that they wouldn't stoop so low but where's any indication they are doing so in this particular case?
I thought whitehouse.com was a porn site. I remember a while back visiting it by accident (you have to use whitehouse.gov).
Ah yes. You "question the timing".
All of the remaining primaries are critical. When might this polygraph occur that you would not question the timing?
Bill Clinton was/is an astute politicion. He engaged in what could certainly be deemed dumb behavior on his part. I think you are equating personal standards with Obama’s behavior. The fact that you are here on FR suggests that your personal standards are much higher than these moonbats. They don’t have standards or morals to guide them as we do.
You pegged Obama for a crack smoker too? See, I’ve met crack addicts, and Obama doesn’t really strike me as resembling them all that closely.
No, but he has admitted coke use in his youth. It’s just that his youth MAY have extended farther than he’s admitting.
I don't think this thread primarily serves to promote whitehouse.com, and besides it does not seem to be a porn site.
No, it isn't.
LOL!
Fringe Candidates Orgy!
Must watch!
re; whitehouse.com
It was, now under “new management” as political news outlet.
Weren’t they a Bush-hater site for the longest time before they “rebranded? That’s what I recall.
Doesn’t belong in print?
Google “larry sinclair” obama
You get 48 pages of results now. On February 11, 2007 you got zero results.
If Larry Sinclair collects his $100K, then that will be plenty of incentive for additional confessions.
I seems to me very unlikely that Obama smoked crack with a near-stranger exactly once instead of either never or some greater number of times. Same with the gay B.J. Either he's the type to have done this or else he isn't. At this point, who knows?
Never mind, that was, and still is, whitehouse.org.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.