Posted on 02/19/2008 11:46:19 AM PST by HD1200
We're not ready to share all the details about our upcoming evening lie-detecting with Obama accuser Larry Sinclair, but there are a few things that we want to tell you – namely that we've agreed on a time and place to carry out our wager with Mr. Sinclair.
We're going to meet him on Tuesday, February 26th at a undisclosed location in New York City. We've picked a polygraph expert, too: a renowned expert who has been involved in quite a few high-profile cases who we're not going to name until the results are not only in, but have been verified by a second renowned expert..
Then, we'll post the results, the names of both polygraph experts, and other relevant information, along with video and pictures, here on Whitehouse.com. Since the outcome of the test will be vital interest to the voting public, our findings will be made available before the presidential primaries in Texas and Ohio slated for March 4. That's all for now, but check back for updates
He’s a neo-marxist, so what?
“Sooooo...what if the guy is telling the truth? Obamalamadingdong will be in deep trouble.....”
And it’s liable to earn him at least HALF of Hillary’s current voters!
If he’d just thought about adding beastiality, and performing an abortion along the way, he’d get the OTHER half, as well...
(Sarc???)
(YOU decide...)
Stupid question. What's your point?
I expect this garbage from the Clintons.
I’m saddened to see so many FReepers clutching it like a life preserver.
Do you have your eggs all painted yet?
Not a life preserver. Obama is a neo-marxist. That should be enough for the GOP to bury him. But if he goes down because of Larry Sinclair instead, it would be hilarious.
“The fact that a former porn site that is now a political news outlet is paying Larry Sinclair $100k to take a polygraph on his allegations of sex and drugs with Obama just screams Larry Flynt.”
Ever heard of TMZ???
Welcome to our brave, new, media-centric world...
There is a reason the tests aren’t admissable in court. What is the point? The guy doesn’t sound like anyone to rely on in any event.
If they have to run a Marxist, at least run a fairly decent guy and not two megalomaniacs who have soiled everything and everyone who has ever had the unfortunate luck to come into their sphere of influence.
Good God, America has had more than enough of these two insufferable wastes of skin...
We’ve discussed this before, you and I.
I prefer to face him on the issues, not rumor or conspiracy theories. We can win on the issues, but if all we have to offer him is pathetic dirt, we’ll get hammered in November. And we will deserve it.
I was wondering one time about that. Load up on the Ziac, and it would make it real easy to give a urine specimen, too! (the diuretic)
“Stupid question. What’s your point?”
I will explain it in terms that even you can understand. I suggested that it was no coincidence that the timing of these anti-obama allegations occurred right before a major primary. You seemed to dismiss that possibility as being unreasonable. I then provided an example of a damaging story whose release was clearly timed to influence an election. The POINT was to prove that such things DO happen.
These allegations surfaced about a month ago.
One way of doing it is the opposite. If your baseline shows high levels of stress, your lies will not register as the polygraph is designed to show variations from the baseline due to stress increasing with lies.
They don’t have to drop a bomb. That idiot Michelle Obama will sink her husband’s campaign before Bill and Hill find any further dirt on B Hussein Obama.
Last fall there was a flurry of activity about some sex scandal that was going to sink a candidate but the media was sitting on it. Remember? Maybe this is it.
(( ping ))
bttt
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.