Posted on 02/17/2008 6:44:21 PM PST by blam
Abbey body identified as gay lover of Edward II
By Laura Clout
Last Updated: 1:06am GMT 18/02/2008
A mutilated body found in an abbey graveyard has been identified as that of a notorious medieval villain rumoured to have been the gay lover of Edward II.
The remains, which bear the hallmarks of having been hanged, drawn and quartered, are thought to be those of Sir Hugh Despenser the Younger, who was executed as a traitor in 1326.
Sir Hugh was executed after Edward II [above] was deposed from the throne in 1326
Sir Hugh had been favourite of Edward II - who was widely believed to have been homosexual - but was brutally executed before a mob after the king was ousted from the throne.
The decapitated remains, buried at Hulton Abbey, Staffs, have intrigued experts since they were uncovered during the 1970s and now Mary Lewis, an anthropologist, says she has uncovered compelling evidence of their true identity.
The manner of execution, carbon-dating of the bones, and the absence of several parts of the body all point towards Sir Hugh being the victim, she said.
"If the remains are those of Sir Hugh Despenser the Younger, then this is the first time such an execution victim has been identified," she added.
Sir Hugh insinuated himself into the king's favour by backing him in his battles with the barons. Through a series of ruthless deals, he consolidated a huge fortune, winning himself a legion of enemies in the process, including Edward's wife, Queen Isabella.
His downfall came when the queen and her ally, Roger Mortimer, deposed the king in 1326.
Sir Hugh was judged a traitor and a thief. He was hanged and, still conscious, castrated, disembowelled and then quartered before his head was displayed on London Bridge.
Miss Lewis, a biological anthropologist at the University of Reading, found that the Staffordshire skeleton had been beheaded and chopped into several pieces with a sharp blade, suggesting a ritual killing.
There was also evidence of a stab wound to the stomach.
She said: "This form of public execution was high theatre that aimed to demonstrate the power of government to the masses. High treason dictated that the perpetrator should suffer more than one death."
Radiocarbon analysis dated the remains to between 1050 and 1385 and subsequent tests suggested that the male was over 34 years old. Sir Hugh was 40 when he was killed.
"Dating of the Hulton Abbey skeleton indicates that he died no later that 1385, when this brutal and very public form of execution was handed out only to the most notorious political prisoners. This suggests that the skeleton at Hulton Abbey was a well-known political figure," Miss Lewis added.
Sir Hugh's wife asked for his bones to be buried on his family's Gloucestershire estate but only the head, a thigh bone and a few vertebrae were returned to her. These are the bones that are missing from the Hulton Abbey skeleton.
In addition, the abbey formed part of the estate of Sir Hugh's brother-in-law, Hugh Audley, and it is thought the family may have chosen to bury what remained of their disgraced relative there.
Worst history ever, with Guinness-long pregnancy of subteen She-Wolf of France.
Actually, "hanging, drawing, and quartering" was the legally prescribed death for traitors. The four quarters were generally displayed at the four major city gates of London as a warning, while the heads were nailed onto "Traitors' Gate" at London Bridge (Sir William Wallace's was placed there), although at a somewhat later period they were put on Temple Bar . . . where I think it was Dr. Johnson who tipped his hat to the head of Sim Fraser, Lord Lovat, the last peer beheaded for treason in England.
You want to read some REAL heavy-duty academic nonsense, check this one out: Deconstructing identities on the scaffold: the execution of Hugh Despenser the Younger, 1326
Interesting quote. I think anyone who taps into a royal line can ultimately go back to the earliest traceable ancestors of Charlemagne, the Arnulfings (descendants of Arnulf, bishop of Metz in the early 600s).
Anyone who can reliably trace ancestry back to Muhammad could then follow his ancestry back several generations earlier. There may be some Irish genealogies that are slightly older, and there are people today who claim descent from Confucius--if accurate, those lineages would be much longer.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
