I don’t see that we need any more threads on this, unless more substantial evidence becomes available.
But that’s just my opinion.
Yeah, until we can produce some phony documents we shouldn't say anything.
I agree. Do you have any?
If it were up to me I wouldn’t run it with out a lot more proof.
We should not post it. Even if the jerk takes a lie-detector test and passes. They can be fooled. I don’t even care if what the jerks says about Obama is true or not.
It’s a cheap way for pond scum like the Clintons to overcome an enemy.
How about a narrative?
Excellent point....the headline is enough for me and I really do not need to see any video
Fully agree with you. Anyone can make crazy allegations; let’s see some proof.
Filth does’nt belong here..,,but it ain’t my site..
This is going to be like playing patty-cake with a pit viper: it WILL bite us.
I’d say yank them all, until there’s a confirm/denial.
I don’t care if he’s (ahem) doing donkeys.
I am more alarmed about the muslim link.
Please don’t allow those posts. If one is so inclined, they can find the stories/videos elsewhere. FWIW.
Pull ‘em.
Thanks. The multiple posts were getting outta hand. ( and I enjoy schadenfreude as musch as anyone)
Maybe just relegate it to chat or the smoky back room automatically?
Skunk ape(Bigfoot) search on in Florida..OK to post
Noahs Ark found (yet again)...OK to post
We all are waiting for the Clinton slime machine to do something and a man surfaces claiming sex/drug use with Obama and a website will pay him 100,000 if he passes a lie detector test....not OK to post.
Hmmmm
We are smart enough to decide. Talking about rumors is not news, however if proven correct I would expect a link and a article in the Breaking News Section.
I say that links to news stories talking about the video are fair game but otherwise we don’t need it. In fact, I think links to youtube videos should be discouraged in general.
>>If we’re going to discuss this topic we should at least ask for more proof.<<
I think we should be open to evidence being found about candidates - real stories do come out in election years.
But since all candidates will have accusations made about them there needs to be real evidence
Schwarzenegger is a good example... lots of smoke that were just sleaze attacks but a couple of real stories mixed in that showed he could act crass.
In the end, none of that was as important that his policies and policies of the guy he was displacing.
So right now I see no point in stories on the Obama allegations unless evidence comes out or the media covers it and then we can discuss the media response.
I think it’s wise to wait on this- if it, or similar is true- we’ll get better proof than this. Otherwise-it’s trash.
In the meantime- there’s actual SUBSTANTIVE and factual areas that we have strong disagreements with Obama.