Transcript in JFK-related discovery will fuel conspiracy chatter

KLTV ^ | February 17, 2008 | Associated Press

[skully]

DALLAS (AP) - Conspiracy theorists will love the latest find related to the assassination of President John F. Kennedy.

A highly suspect transcript discussing a plot to kill the president is part of some JFK-related memorabilia discovered by the Dallas County District Attorney's Office.

[Deb]

According to the Venona tapes and the head of the Russian secret police, the KGB considered it’s two greatest propaganda achievements to be: (1) trashing the memory and reputation of J.Edgar Hoover and (2) deflecting attention away from the Communist who killed JFK, onto just about everyone else, including the CIA.

[Deb]

This thread is solid proof the KGB has done a brilliant job.

[Hatteras]

"...both believe that Lyndon had Jack offed."

Careful there... ;-)

[Mr. K]

You know all we normally ask for polite exchange here

You are welcome to disagree with anyone without name-calling

[DugwayDuke]

At the newsconference on FoxNews this AM, the speaker reported that in addition to this ‘transcript’ there was also a movie contract in the safe. One might believe that this ‘transcript’ is really just a part of the script for the movie.

[Rte66]

That’s exactly how it was reported in the first story on it a couple of days ago here on local news in Houston - that it was part of a screenplay draft written by Henry Wade, the DA at the time.

It was never reported as anything different.

[The KG9 Kid]

"... The medical staff at parkland hospital clearly denoted a large exit wound in the back of JFK’s head."

No they didn't.

[The KG9 Kid]

"... When did all the ‘single shooter’ proponents get so rude?"

It comes as a result of dealing with ignorant dumbasses who perpetuate the JFK conspiracy myth.

[Mr. K]

And for the record, the governement went to GREAT LENGTHS to show that a persons head can move BAKCWARD after getting hit from behind, the oppositie of the argument you make now.

[DogandPonyShow]

I made the argument that his head went forward then backward...pay attention.

[DugwayDuke]

“It was never reported as anything different.”

Except here on free republic.

[Shooter 2.5]

The cratered effect is an entrance wound. Look up ballistics and learn something. SMALL HOLE IN. LARGE HOLE OUT.

The crowd moved upward to the parking lot because they could watch the limo go north on Stemmons Freeway.

Zapruder filmed the corner of the fence and like the dozens of people didn’t see anyone with a firearm. Why? Because Zapruder was ON THE GRASSY KNOLL.

[fabian]

that’s your whole argument, no they didn’t? Please look at these quotes from the staff at parkland hospital...http://ourworld.cs.com/mikegriffith1/id89.htm
these are not made up, they are well known by laymen and researchers alike. Later, the reality of what they witnessed was twisted by the cover up, but the facts of what they saw and what the public saw when JFK’s head snapped back voilently from the front shot, are still the facts.

[The KG9 Kid]

It's not true. The direct testimony of the doctors at Parkland Hospital related to Gerald Posner unequivocally state that there was no frontal entry wound nor any sort of autopsy or professional judgement done as to the wounds received by JFK. They were doing nothing but trying to save his life. Their testimony to the Warren Commission was that the wounds were consistent with the WC's analysis: Rear head shot being the decisive fatal blow.

Sorry. Time to grow out of the conspiracy theories.

[fabian]

not at all, many people around the assasination were murdered...that is a researchable fact. They simply were in fear and changed their original observations. The honest thing to do is look at what they originally observed, not what they said later under duress. Those are the facts, what they observed originally. Sorry, but any amount of twisting just doesn’t cut it except for very gullible people. Posner is not very astute and his book doesn’t hold a candle to the many very reputable researchers and scientific experts who have written about the obvious mutiple field of fire that took place.

[The KG9 Kid]

"... many people around the assasination were murdered...that is a researchable fact. They simply were in fear and changed their original observations."

No they weren't.

[fabian]

well, you simply don’t care about the facts or have been too lazy to find them out. They are what they are and you are in denial. That’s ok, I’m not going to try and talk you out of it.

[Mr. K]

Zapruder was on a concrete pillar on the side of the steps. A female friend was holding onto him so he would not fall off. The grassy knoll was to his right and rear.

He was filming and looking in the direction of Kennedy when hit, and for a short time afterwards, loing enough to time to film Jackie crawling out on the the trunk to recover Kennedy’s brains, and back. By the time he if facing anywhere near the knoll the shooter would have been gone.

There were many witnesses that reported hearing a shot FROM the knoll.

There was also a shot (not accounted for in the Warren Commision report) that hit a curb that was removed.

But the most convincing evidence to me is viewing the Zapruder film. I went to college for Physics- I know what it looks like to me, a shot from the front.

[Mr. K]

"No they weren't."

now THATS a convincing argument...

I bet he believes Vince Foster committed suicide too