To: kabar
Did you vote for the Republicans in 2000 or 2004? Because you know that the "Amnesty" plan of President Bush (McCain supported) was a plank of the GOP platform.
Or have you decided that "amnesty" was good then, but not now?
153 posted on
02/16/2008 3:10:46 PM PST by
PugetSoundSoldier
(Indignation over the sting of truth is the defense of the indefensible)
To: PugetSoundSoldier
Did you vote for the Republicans in 2000 or 2004? Because you know that the "Amnesty" plan of President Bush (McCain supported) was a plank of the GOP platform. Or have you decided that "amnesty" was good then, but not now?As always, I voted a straight Rep ticket in 2000 and 2004. Amnesty was not part of the platform. The 2006 Senate bill [S. 2611] that passed was amnesty and so was McCain-Kennedy. chiMcCain was one of the chief architects of both bills and the WH supported him. If I had known that that was the WH position in either 2000 or 2004, I would not have voted for Bush.
Amnesty was never good either now or in 1986. I find it interesting that McCain voted AGAINST the 1986 amnesty bill despite being a "footsoldier in the Reagan Revolution."
158 posted on
02/16/2008 3:19:47 PM PST by
kabar
To: PugetSoundSoldier
Did you vote for the Republicans in 2000 or 2004? Because you know that the "Amnesty" plan of President Bush (McCain supported) was a plank of the GOP platform. Nope I did exactly what you propose I do now. How well has that worked out for us?
Not this time soldier.
289 posted on
02/16/2008 7:37:17 PM PST by
itsahoot
(Gingrich: "We don't have a peace process. We have a surrender process." (Duncan Hunter gets it.))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson