Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Anti-Hillary

I forgot to add that he also takes the racist, anti-African-American Eugenicist Margaret Sanger’s side regarding abortion.


16 posted on 02/14/2008 8:16:23 PM PST by 444Flyer (The Lord is a warrior, the Lord is His name (Exodus 15:3))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: 444Flyer
On the Illinois Senate floor, Obama was the only senator to speak against the baby-protecting bills. He voted "present" on each, effectively the same as a "no." "Number one," said Obama, explaining his reluctance to protect born infants, "whenever we define a pre-viable fetus as a person that is protected by the Equal Protection Clause or the other elements in the Constitution, what we're really saying is, in fact, that they are persons that are entitled to the kinds of protections that would be provided to a -- a child, a 9-month old -- child that was delivered to term. That determination then, essentially, if it was accepted by a court, would forbid abortions to take place. I mean, it -- it would essentially bar abortions, because the Equal Protection Clause does not allow somebody to kill a child, and if this is a child, then this would be an anti-abortion statute."

Money quote. I'm keeping this.

20 posted on 02/14/2008 8:24:44 PM PST by Big Giant Head (I should change my tagline to "Big Giant penguin on my Head")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: 444Flyer

It’s ironic isn’t it? Obama supports a position that was originated to cull the negro race? That’s the truth that no one wants to discuss (on either side).


31 posted on 02/14/2008 8:46:05 PM PST by khnyny (Quid Est Veritas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson