Posted on 02/14/2008 2:14:33 PM PST by smoothsailing
I'll assume you lived through the late 70's. What makes you think things could get worse than that? It was spectacularly bad.
well that’s one conservative vote in his corner.
Gerry Ford was a pretty decent guy. Johm mcCain is not. There’s no comparison.
Probably the best person to make a judgment on that would be GWB.
Yeah, yeah, I’ll vote for him...and he’ll lose. That’s a certainty right now. Democrats are outvoting Republicans in primaries by almost 2:1.
I think we need to shift our focus to certain House and Senate races. We need to limit the new Dem President’s influence and get some good conservatives elected to Congress.
Ronald Reagan fought for decades to get us there, and he put his ideas into practice and proved they work. It's a different world than in 1972 or 1976, and to say that we have to accept the notion that conservatives go back to being the crazy uncles in the back of the room while the Bushes and Rockefellers make the real decisions is simply unacceptable.
The goal is to convince the American people that Conservatism is the way to go. If the GOP won't accept conservatism, then we need to take our 20 or 30 percent of the electorate, run conservative candidates, and work to get that number to 50 percent. After all, what is the point of winning elections if it is just to implement policies with which we disagree?
Okeedokee!
Why have a military on foreign soil if we have no borders at home? Why risk their lives for nothing?
That’s where Reagans followers may have done more for the country than Reagan’s personal decency would allow. We go forward by polarizing, not by bi-partanship. It would have been a huge tragedy, and perhaps a global disaster, had Reagan not taken the White House. In this election cycle, John McCAin is just the sort of fascist to preside over a vast abridgement of Constitutional rights. There may be a few nice, meek, falsely-decent Republican who go along with him, but real Americans have got to oppose this thug tooth and nail.
It’s nice to see, skeeter, that you have more respect for Ronald Reagan than his own son.
Reagan wouldn't have done anything against Gerald Ford in 1976, but Ford complained that Reagan didn't do anything for him either.
Bush's father also wanted more of an endorsement from Reagan in 1988.
So, sure, Reagan wouldn't go along with Ann Coulter's "Vote for Hillary" campaign, but beyond that ...
Michael Reagan is not a Reagan Reupulican. And neither was his father.
/sarc
And maybe next time the conservatives have good candidates they will get behind one who can win a national election and carry him/her forward. They had at least two this go around and they are now noth out of the race. I wanted Fred or Hunter and could have lived with Romney but the conservative base didn’t get behind them.
Here’s a scary thought, maybe McCain does win and without the help of conservatives. What to do then?
I am not sure that it is a totally fair question. The question which precedes it, is what would Ronald Reagan have done? He would not have gotten in this stinking position in the first place. I take Ronald Reagan at his word and the first thing that he would have done with congressinal majorities, is ABOLISH the Department of Education, instead of getting in bed with Teddy Kennedy letting him write the bill which the federal government further destroyed the public education system.
And Ronald Reagan would not have let a MAVERICK game the nomination system so that New Hampshire and South Carolina, and blues state wins on super tuesday could lock up the nomination. Reagan would have supported the nominee but had he had influence instead of lip service to his legacy over the last eight years then a MAVERICK/collaborator would not have gotten the nomination.
Is this an insult?
Reagan was once a Democrat only to reject the evil after he saw it for what it is. I don't see Obama hanging with the devil like Hillary does. He's a black box at this point. No one really knows if he's going to break left, right, or center. Being absent a chip on his shoulder he's not likely to break hard left as everyone thinks.
No, that's pretty much been their strategy since McCain was seen to be unbeatable.
I agree with Mr. Reagan.
My hope is that Mr. McCain has the good sense to select a VEEP with solid conservative creds (John Boehner and Mitt Romney come to mind).
This would be the only way to convince many here (including moi) of sufficient conservatism to merit a vote.
He has broken very leftist. Study up on the guy.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.