1 posted on
02/14/2008 2:12:31 PM PST by
JSDude1
To: JSDude1
www.dogpile.com combines several together.
To: JSDude1
I use Alta Vista. Created by FReeper Holger Dansk.
To: JSDude1
Google works fine. You just need to refine and redefine your search terms until whatever it is you are looking for pops up.
4 posted on
02/14/2008 2:15:09 PM PST by
3AngelaD
(They screwed up their own countries so bad they had to leave, and now they're here screwing up ours)
To: JSDude1
5 posted on
02/14/2008 2:15:10 PM PST by
Minnesoootan
(Hillary+Bill=Baggage x 2,solve the theorem...sumpin has to stick!)
To: JSDude1
Alta Vista, as suggested is good.
Quintura is good also.
6 posted on
02/14/2008 2:17:56 PM PST by
fireforeffect
(A kind word and a 2x4, gets you more than just a kind word.)
To: JSDude1
Conservatives could restore balance to the search engines but we have jobs and can’t sit in our parents’ basement all day pumping up hits on conservative sites.
To: JSDude1
To: JSDude1
I use ask.com, or prolife.com
16 posted on
02/14/2008 3:50:36 PM PST by
gidget7
(Duncan Hunter-Valley Forge Republican!)
To: JSDude1
This is a question to all you freepers (the last 2-4) years I have really notices that there is ~NOT~ balance in the search results I have recieved from googe + yahoo. In fact if you look for alternate search engines from those websites they don't lead you anywhere either.. I am SO Sick of the liberal bias- I never used to get unbalanced results from these website engines. Please IF anyone knows about any good alternate search engines: Please tell me!! I am trapped..!
I have been working on my own project which will resolve that problem. IT IS NOT A SEARCH ENGINE. Is is a set of tools which if used correctly by the producers and users, would guarantee unbiased but accurate "search" results for whatever you were seeking on the internet. It's meant as a set of tools for news, information, commentaries and editorials, and would also direct users to discussions pertinent to whatever articles they got hits on.
Here's a small narrative of what I'm proposing that the system will do:
What and How...
A categorized cross-reference for:
* News Articles
* Columnists
* Editorials and Commentaries
* Informational Articles
* Discussions
Articles may be searched by:
* Categories & Sub-Categories (up to 4 levels)
* Subjects covered within article
* Authors / Columnists
* Publishers
* Publisher Types (Newspapers, Magazines, TV, Radio, etc.)
* Dates or Date Ranges
* Geographical Location pertinent to the article
* Any Combination(s) of any or all of the above
The system serves as a cross-reference to the actual articles. The articles do no exist on this system. However, this system contains enough information from the articles for the user to make an informed and intelligent decision about whether the article(s) warrants further reading and/or investigation.
Once the user enters the criteria for a search of the articles, the system presents a list or menu of available articles for that criteria. Furthermore, the user may click on any article on the available articles menu to get an "Excerpt" from the article. The Excerpt is presented on the rightmost side of the "Search Articles" page.
In addition, a user may enter into a discussion for an article if one is available and the author or columnist has made that discussion page available through a link in the Excerpt page.
Most of the system is written and it can do all of what the narrative states.
I may need some help later during implementation and in the web site setup. The database has the potential of growing into one of the largest in the internet.
I'll be glad to take suggestions and questions.
19 posted on
02/14/2008 5:12:35 PM PST by
adorno
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson