Replies

You're still arguing about the degree as to one being better than the other. That is missing the whole point. Don't you get it yet? They're all basically on the same team, they're all globalists! That's why these days the government grows the same under a Republican as it does under a Dem (sometimes more) and why the borders are open with a globalist R or a D in office. There comes a point when you have to cut them off, because it WILL keep getting worse and worse. Unless you WANT a new world order?

"They're all basically on the same team, they're all globalists!"
Yup... but there are still huge differences in them. Find an issue McCain is wrong on, and you will see that Obama and Hillary are even more radical about on the issue.

You're still arguing about the degree as to one being better than the other.
YES! Of course I am. One of them WILL be president, those are the choices, those are the choices, those are the choices. Obama and Hillary are worse, they are far far worse.

Go find someone is a real conservative and begin backing them and come up with a great campaign that will connect with America. You have 4 years, I would sure like to see it happen, I would LOVE to see it happen. The primaries are winding are mostly over, its to late this cycle. There are men out there that could inspire the nation for conservatism, and I would like to see one run for office that will stay in the race longer than Tom, Duncan, Fred or Mitt did. I would love to have a good guy to support. You/we need 4 years to see if someone can do it.

Unless you WANT a new world order?
Dont be insulting, Im trying to have a discussion here.
If someone can win the nomination and beat the dems, that is a conservative and has a realistic chance of winning, the FRiend, Im all for it.
If not, Ill take McCain as a Commander in Chief over the marxist obama. Ill take a McCain SCOTUS over Hillary's pick.

VERY INTERESTING . . . 'off hand' slip by Pres of Mexico:

from:

#######################

interesting quote from Mexican president Felipe Calderon

I was watching the news hour with Jim Lehrer last night and there was a segment about Calderon visiting California. you can listen [at link below], about a quarter of the way through the broadcast where Calderon describes the economies of Mexico and California.

He asks for investment from California and "the rest of the Union"

At first I didn't think too much because the union he could be referring to might only be the rest of the USA.

Since I'm still not completely sold on the NAU I googled and googlenews'd "north american union" and came up with a lot of articles from august 2007, around the time of a press release from spp.gov

I find it suspicious that Bush would laugh it off as "jelly bean standardization" when the release and the "security agenda" both outline what amounts to be the formation of a union.

It's also kind of suspect that the joint meetings are typically invite only.

#################

ORIGINAL SOURCE LINK: