Skip to comments.
Biofuels Meltdown
American Spectator ^
| 13 feb 08
| William Tucker
Posted on 02/13/2008 6:38:26 AM PST by rellimpank
Last week two studies published in Science announced what anyone might have suspected all along. "Biofuels," rather than reducing carbon emissions, are adding two them -- possibly by a factor of nearly 100!
The two studies may finally puncture the myth that anything is to be gained from burning crops for fuel. From the very beginning, there was never any indication that turning corn into ethanol was improving our energy independence. As that effort faltered, the myth arose that at least it was reducing carbon emissions. Now it has been shown to do neither.
Meanwhile, thanks to a 51-cents-per-gallon tax break, 25 percent of the American corn crop is being turned into ethanol. Farmland prices are soaring and food prices are escalating all over the world.
(Excerpt) Read more at spectator.org ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: agw; blaspheminggore; energy; environmanet; globalwarming
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-137 next last
To: xcamel
2
posted on
02/13/2008 6:39:05 AM PST
by
rellimpank
(--don't believe anything the MSM tells you about firearms or explosives--NRA Benefactor)
To: Defendingliberty; WL-law; Normandy; TenthAmendmentChampion; Beowulf
To: rellimpank; Killing Time; Beowulf; Mr. Peabody; RW_Whacko; honolulugal; SideoutFred; Ole Okie; ...


Food is
not fuel
4
posted on
02/13/2008 6:42:36 AM PST
by
xcamel
(Two-hand-voting now in play - One on lever, other holding nose.)
To: rellimpank
Just more B.S. from the petroleum lobby - consisting of Arabs and that Venzuela nutcase.
5
posted on
02/13/2008 6:43:04 AM PST
by
hgro
(Jerry Riversd)
To: rellimpank
Making corn-based ethanol should be a felony.
6
posted on
02/13/2008 6:45:10 AM PST
by
montag813
To: montag813
But then how am I going to get my Jack Daniel’s?
To: rellimpank
Last week two studies published in Science announced what anyone might have suspected all along. "Biofuels," rather than reducing carbon emissions, are adding two them. Adding TWO them? Fire the editor.
8
posted on
02/13/2008 6:46:49 AM PST
by
mbynack
(Retired USAF SMSgt)
To: rellimpank
"Biofuels," rather than reducing carbon emissions, are adding two them I don't know about carbon, but The American Spectator obviously needs a copy editor!
9
posted on
02/13/2008 6:49:27 AM PST
by
iowamark
To: montag813
One of my customers makes Parmesan cheese. A byproduct of their process is three truckloads of 200 proof alcohol, which they sell into the gasoline blending biz.
10
posted on
02/13/2008 6:49:59 AM PST
by
Eric in the Ozarks
(ENERGY CRISIS made in Washington D. C.)
To: rellimpank
LOL... HRC is a champion of bio-fuels. But then again... the average voter knows nothing when it comes to feasible alternatives(if the even exist) to drilled oil.
11
posted on
02/13/2008 6:53:16 AM PST
by
johnny7
("But that one on the far left... he had crazy eyes")
To: rellimpank; SierraWasp; george76; BOBTHENAILER
Reality bites envirals again.
I wish there was some way to take these lying/spinning eco bastards to court and sue the hell out of them.
12
posted on
02/13/2008 6:53:55 AM PST
by
Grampa Dave
("Ron Paul and his flaming antiwar spam monkeys can Kiss my Ass!!"- Jim Robinson, Sept, 30, 2007)
To: rellimpank; RedStateRocker; Dementon; eraser2005; Calpernia; DTogo; Maelstrom; Yehuda; babble-on; ..
Renewable Energy Ping 
Please Freep Mail me if you'd like on/off
To: rellimpank
Some Germans, during WWII ran autos on gas generated directly from wood chips. No wasting time converting to ethanol. Ethanol now is a politically protected product. Every idiot around is touting ethanol while criticizing the production.
14
posted on
02/13/2008 6:55:43 AM PST
by
FreePaul
To: rellimpank
The democrap motto should be “The Road to hell is paved with good intention”
15
posted on
02/13/2008 6:56:48 AM PST
by
Mr. K
(Some days even my lucky rocketship underpants don't help)
To: Eric in the Ozarks
We just need to increase Parmeson Cheese production about 100,000 times and we are home free on ethanol, but what the heck do we do with all the cheese?
16
posted on
02/13/2008 6:58:33 AM PST
by
HD1200
To: Grampa Dave
Sooo, how do you really feel? LOL! I know exactly what you mean.
17
posted on
02/13/2008 6:58:59 AM PST
by
alwaysconservative
(The "Run Hillary Run" bumpersticker: on the back bumper for Dems, on the front for Republicans!)
To: rellimpank
The article is seriously misinformed except for one thing: I do agree we shouldn’t try to replace oil with alternative fuels.
The place for alternative fuels is as an oxygenate to burn the gas better. That’s all. We simply can’t replace oil with ethanol or anything else.
And we need to move up to butanol and ester fuels and away from ethanol.
18
posted on
02/13/2008 6:59:11 AM PST
by
Free Vulcan
(Don't think I can vote for you John, I'm feelin' like a maverick.)
To: xcamel
Thanks for the ping! I wonder how many people could have been fed with the corn products, and how many nations have starving people due to this MIS-use of earth’s resources in the name of political correctness?
19
posted on
02/13/2008 7:00:36 AM PST
by
alwaysconservative
(The "Run Hillary Run" bumpersticker: on the back bumper for Dems, on the front for Republicans!)
To: hgro
Got any specific complaints about any specific assertions in the article?
20
posted on
02/13/2008 7:02:08 AM PST
by
Minn
(Here is a realistic picture of the prophet: ----> ([: {()
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-137 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson