Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(Congressman) Wamp blasts Saudi arms sale
Chattanooga Times Free Press ^ | February 13, 2008 | Herman Wang

Posted on 02/13/2008 2:25:08 AM PST by Tennessee Nana

WASHINGTON — Hoping to block a $120 million sale of weapons to Saudi Arabia that goes through on Friday, Rep. Zach Wamp, R-Tenn., and two other Republican lawmakers on Tuesday urged their colleagues to oppose President Bush’s plans.

A resolution signed by 80 Democrats and 13 Republicans opposes the sale of 900 Joint Direct Attack Munitions to Saudi Arabia. Rep. Wamp called it “a mistake” to be selling high-tech weapons to a country that consistently bankrolls terrorist organizations.

“We have tried to buy friends with arms, but usually it doesn’t work, and they turn around and use them against us,” Rep. Wamp said. “There is a clear pattern of the royal family aiding and abetting the enemy. They have to prove they’re our friends, and they haven’t done that.”

According to the Arms Control Export Act of 1976, the president is required to notify Congress of an impending arms sale, giving the legislative body 30 days to consider the deal. That deadline to pass a joint resolution of disapproval expires Thursday.

President Bush has said the sale is needed to keep Saudi Arabia as an ally in stabilizing the Middle East.

Lawmakers opposing the sale note that 70 percent of the most-wanted international terrorists are Saudi Arabians and that the majority of suicide bombers in Iraq have come from Saudi Arabia.

“People of all political stripes have come out against this deal,” said Rep. Anthony Weiner, D-N.Y., who is leading the opposition to the sale.

“The Saudis at every turn have been uncooperative,” Rep. Weiner said. “The idea that we are going to reward the Saudis with precision weaponry is a stunningly bad idea, and clearly deserves the full review of Congress.”

With two days left before the deadline and just 93 House members committed to the resolution, Rep. Wamp acknowledged that their chances of getting it passed are getting slimmer. Congress still can prevent the sale through separate legislative action.

“Time is running out,” he said. “We had hoped there’d be more scrutiny. We should think about what’s in our best interests.”


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; US: Tennessee
KEYWORDS: 110th; armssales; congress; saudiarabia; tennessee; wamp; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last
To: Tennessee Nana
Thanx for the ping, TN. Our Congressman, Sue Myrick, is one of the few Republicans opposed to this move. She has taken some strong pro-American stands and we are proud of her.

It was stated:

“President Bush has said the sale is needed to keep Saudi Arabia as an ally in stabilizing the Middle East.”

Hogwash! We stand between Saudi Arabia and the militants who want to overthrow those effete Saudi’s. Do they show gratitude? [Or offer more or cheaper oil?] Don’t hold your breath.

This deal is a bad idea, and if any of this stuff ends up in the hands of our enemies, it will be a horrible deal.

21 posted on 02/13/2008 5:45:44 AM PST by FOXFANVOX (God Bless Tony Snow!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee Nana
The Saudi "Royal Family" has several thousand members ~ some put it at over 50,000 people, others at less than 10,000, but still huge compared to most.

Most of them don't live in Saudi, so how is it they receive arms from us?

22 posted on 02/13/2008 6:40:38 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: moonman

If we have to buy their friendship with arms, they’re not our friends.


23 posted on 02/13/2008 7:34:17 AM PST by wastedyears (This is my BOOMSTICK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee Nana
Yep, it's time to stop selling arms to our enemies. There is a military-industrial complex and in this case it is working against the interests of the United States.
24 posted on 02/13/2008 9:41:27 AM PST by oneolcop (Take off the gloves!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe Boucher
If not for oil they’d still be sand fleas.

Correction. They're sand fleas with oil.

L

25 posted on 02/13/2008 10:56:21 AM PST by Lurker (Pimping my blog: http://lurkerslair-lurker.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

True
that and the scum of the earth.


26 posted on 02/13/2008 11:06:56 AM PST by Joe Boucher (An enemy of Islam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee Nana

You mean Mexico Jorge?


27 posted on 02/13/2008 8:38:33 PM PST by Pelham (Press 1 for English)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee Nana

I agree with the Congressman.


28 posted on 02/13/2008 8:40:15 PM PST by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson