Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Great Britain: Internet users could be banned over illegal downloads
The Times (U.K.) ^ | February 12, 2008 | Francis Eliott

Posted on 02/12/2008 10:23:55 AM PST by Stoat

Internet users could be banned over illegal downloads

 

People who illegally download films and music will be cut off from the internet under new legislative proposals to be unveiled next week.

Internet service providers (ISPs) will be legally required to take action against users who access pirated material, The Times has learnt.

Users suspected of wrongly downloading films or music will receive a warning e-mail for the first offence, a suspension for the second infringement and the termination of their internet contract if caught a third time, under the most likely option to emerge from discussions about the new law.

Broadband companies who fail to enforce the “three-strikes” regime would be prosecuted and suspected customers’ details could be made available to the courts. The Government has yet to decide if information on offenders should be shared between ISPs.

Six million broadband users are estimated to download files illegally every year in this country in a practice that music and film companies claim is costing them billions of pounds in lost revenue annually.

Britain’s four biggest internet providers – BT, Tiscali, Orange and Virgin Media – have been in talks with Hollywood’s biggest studio and distribution companies for six months over a voluntary scheme.

Parallel negotiations between Britain’s music industry and individual internet providers have been dragging on for two years.

Major sticking points include who will arbitrate disputed allegations, for example when customers claim to have been the victim of “wi-fi piggybacking”, in which users link up to a paid-for wireless network that is not their own. Another outstanding disagreement is how many enforcements the internet companies will be expected to initiate and how quickly warning e-mails would be sent.

International action in the US and France, which is implementing its own “three-strikes” regime, has increased the pressure on British internet companies and stiffened the Government’s resolve.

Ministers will make an explicit commitment to legislate with the launch next week of a Green Paper on the creative industries. A draft copy, obtained by The Times, states: “We will move to legislate to require internet service providers to take action on illegal file-sharing.” A consultation paper setting out the options is promised within months.

A spokesman for the Internet Service Providers Association said it remained hopeful that agreement over a voluntary agreement could be reached: “Every right-thinking body knows that self-regulation is much the better option in these areas.”

Roz Groome, vice-president of antipiracy for NBC Universal, welcomed the prospect of new laws. “We welcome the signal from Government that it values the health of the creative industries and takes seriously the damage caused by widespread online copyright infringement. We call upon ISPs to take action now. They must play their part in the fight against online piracy and work with rights owners to ensure that ISPs’ customers do not use their services for illegal activity. Piracy stifles innovation and threatens the long term health of our industry.”

Ed Vaizey, the Shadow Arts Minister, said: “David Cameron called on the internet providers to address this issue last summer. The credibility of the Government’s latest threat is undermined by the fact that ministers have spent so many years dithering on whether to legislate.”

The commitment forms part of a Green Paper on the creative industries entitled The World’s Creative Hub to be launched by Andy Burnham, the Culture Secretary, and Gordon Brown next week.

Other high-profile elements include a pledge that children will be entitled to five hours of culture a week overseen by a new youth culture trust. The pledge will give children the right to learn a musical instrument, visit art galleries and museums and even make films.

Other pledges include setting up a new international conference modelled on Davos, entitled the World Creative Economy Forum, and supporting a new £200 million film centre at the South Bank in London. A spokeswoman for the Department for Culture, Media and Sport said: “Early drafts of our creative economy programme document were circulated to stakeholders for comment. The content and proposals for the strategy have been significantly developed since then and a comprehensive plan to bolster the UK’s creative industries will be published shortly. We will not comment on the content of the leaked document.”



TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; Technical; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: britain; celebratediversity; indoctrination; internet; politicalreeducation; privacy; tech; thoughtcontrol; uk; unitedkingdom
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last
To: Stoat

Thanks for the link, Stoat. very informative stuff you’ve got there.

A license to OWN and watch TV.....a bunch of sheep these Brits. Just imagine (well, I can’t) if they won the Revolutionary War: we’d be getting licenses right now just to watch the Super Bowl on my 50 inch HD.


41 posted on 02/14/2008 9:54:26 AM PST by max americana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Stoat
The way it's presented in the article reminds me just a little bit of the various excuses and rationales that I occasionally hear from abortionists and certain genetic scientists who, when asked about whether they think what they do is right or wrong they reply that it's not their job to concern themselves with such things; that's the job of lawmakers and legislators....essentially the "we don't care because we don't have to" defense.

Essentially the Soviet position. If the government wants something you have to do it regardless of any moral framework you have, because if the government wants it, it must be right, right?

I get pissed when private companies have some kind of industrial accident and disclaim responsibility because their procedures met minimum government regs. Do they really want to take the position that government bureaucrats are better qualified than people who work in the industry to know the best way to deal with hazards??? I don't want excessive regulation by people who have never done it (and are often selected from the enemies of the industry) but by the same token, you can't have it both ways.

42 posted on 02/14/2008 12:27:27 PM PST by Still Thinking (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: max americana
Thanks for the link, Stoat. very informative stuff you’ve got there.

You're quite welcome and I'm delighted if you've found it interesting  :-)

A license to OWN and watch TV.....a bunch of sheep these Brits. Just imagine (well, I can’t) if they won the Revolutionary War: we’d be getting licenses right now just to watch the Super Bowl on my 50 inch HD.

Apparently, according to the TV licensing site, you also have to have a special license if you want to sell a TV, even a used one.

Looking at the TV licensing requirements reminds me of the hoops that you need to jump through in order to buy a firearm here in the USA, and the record-keeping requirements appear to be similarly detailed.

The Brits have been under the 'watchful eye' of the TV Detection vans since 1938 so it seems they're quite accustomed to living under what we Yanks would consider to be an astonishing and completely unacceptable level of intrusiveness

Tvdetect2_2

BBC Technology To Find Insurgents Danger Room from Wired.com

This page may also be of interest (from 2003):

BBC - Press Office - New generation of television detector vans

(edit)

The new vans use the most advanced technology available and are the first to be designed with removable TV Licensing branding, designed to make them look like any other white van on the streets.


Vanessa Wood, TV Licensing spokesperson, said: "These new vans really are a case of 'now you see it, now you don't'. "Because we are able to remove the TV Licensing logo, licence evaders won't know we're in the area unless we want them to.


"50 years ago you could spot the first TV detector vans coming a mile off as the aerial on top was as wide as the van. This is the first time we have used covert vans and they will be only one part of our activities to target licence evaders."

Last year TV Licensing caught over 440,000 evaders. The technology developed especially for this new generation of vans means that evaders are even more likely to be caught.

Vanessa Wood said: "The new vans are so powerful they can tell if a TV is in use in as little as 20 seconds. And once the television is detected, the equipment - which works from up to 60 metres away - can pinpoint the actual room that the television set is in.

"However, the technology is so secret that even the engineers working on different detection systems worked in isolation – not even they know how the other detection methods work."

 

(edit)

43 posted on 02/14/2008 6:25:36 PM PST by Stoat (Rice / Coulter 2012: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

Dear God, if you took out the word “British” in the entire article, I thought I was reading a report from Communist China or Cuba.

I immigrated from Canada, and this just boggles the mind. Thanks for the info.

You need ANOTHER license to SELL a TV???


44 posted on 02/14/2008 7:48:25 PM PST by max americana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: max americana
Dear God, if you took out the word “British” in the entire article, I thought I was reading a report from Communist China or Cuba.

I immigrated from Canada, and this just boggles the mind.

Welcome Home  :-)

 American Flag

 

 Thanks for the info.

You're quite welcome; my pleasure  :-)

You need ANOTHER license to SELL a TV???

I should correct my previous post which I made from memory (always a bad plan for me).  According to the TV Licensing page for dealers, you need to be "registered" which MAY be different from a 'license'. I am HOPING that there's an exemption for private individuals, so you can sell your buddy your old TV when you're tired of it, but I couldn't find any mention of sales between private individuals at the TV licensing site.

TV Licensing - TV Dealers

Why do we need to notify you of all our sales and rentals?

-
If you sell or rent TV receiving equipment, under The Wireless Telegraphy Act 1967 (as amended) - you are required to notify us within 28 days of each transaction, providing full details of the purchaser or hirer.

This includes the sale or rental of any new or second-hand:

 
  • TVs
  • VCRs
  • DVD recorders
  • Set-top boxes
  • PCs with broadcast (TV) cards
  • TV cards
-
Back to top

Do we need to be registered with you to send our notifications?

-
Yes. If you are not already registered, please click here to download a registration form.

Print and complete your registration form and post it to us at:

TV Licensing (dealer department)
Customer Services Centre
PO Box 88
Darwen
BB3 1YX

Alternatively, you can call us on 0844 800 5819.

What information do we need to give you?

-
You will be required to complete a form which details:

 
The purchaser or hirer's:
  • Title, initials and surname
  • Address and postcode of where the equipment will be installed

 
  • The date of the transaction
  • Whether the equipment is colour or black and white
  • Header and trailer - for disk and email notifications
  • Your dealer name and address
  • Your dealer registration and outlet number.
  • What type of equipment it is (TV, video recorder, DVD recorder, set-top box, PC with broadcast card etc) - although this data is optional it is really valuable information and your help is appreciated.

Please take care to ensure that you spell everything correctly and any information that is hand-written is legible.
-
Back to top

What happens if we don't notify you?

-
It is an offence not to notify us of every transaction. Failure to do so could result in a fine of up to £1,000 per offence for you, or the store manager employed by your company.

Recently a major retailer was fined a total of £14,400 plus £1,350 costs for failing to notify TV Licensing of television equipment sales and rentals in 3 of its stores.
-
Back to top

What do you do with the information?

-
We log all notification details into our database, which we match against our records of current licence holders. If they don't match up we will investigate any potential licence evaders who may be breaking the law by watching TV without a licence.

45 posted on 02/14/2008 8:15:47 PM PST by Stoat (Rice / Coulter 2012: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson