[weegee]

ALL’s video wasn’t yanked? Or did you read that as “all videos”?

[ClearCase_guy]

I certainly read the headline as indicating that 100% of the content of YouTube had been made inaccessible. I figured there was an effort to contain a virus or something like that.

Of course, I read the article and found out that ALL was an acronym. But I thought the headline was not well chosen (accept as an eye grabber).