1 posted on
02/11/2008 1:54:21 PM PST by
Rikstir
To: Rikstir
2 posted on
02/11/2008 1:55:26 PM PST by
Rikstir
To: Vroomfondel; SC Swamp Fox; Fred Hayek; NY Attitude; P3_Acoustic; Bean Counter; investigateworld; ...
SONOBUOY PING!
Click on pic for past Navair pings.
Post or FReepmail me if you wish to be enlisted in or discharged from the Navair Pinglist.
This is a medium to low volume pinglist.
3 posted on
02/11/2008 1:56:32 PM PST by
magslinger
(cranky right-winger)
To: Rikstir
How do these proposed Royal Navy carriers compare to ours, such as the Reagan?
4 posted on
02/11/2008 1:57:02 PM PST by
AxelPaulsenJr
(God Bless George W. Bush)
To: Rikstir
Glad to see the Brits still want to invest in their defence, unlike the rest of the Euroweenies.
5 posted on
02/11/2008 1:58:11 PM PST by
DeusExMachina05
(I will not go into Dhimmitude quietly.)
To: Rikstir
The two 65,000 tonne aircraft carriers... Um, no offense to our British friends but a supercarrier starts at 75,000 ton displacement.
6 posted on
02/11/2008 1:59:51 PM PST by
pgyanke
("Huntered"--The act of being ignored by media and party to prevent name recognition)
To: Rikstir
40 posted on
02/11/2008 5:43:51 PM PST by
ARE SOLE
(Agents Ramos and Campean are in prison at this very moment.. (A "Concerned Citizen".)
To: Rikstir
Someone needs to tell the Brits that their cute little mini-flattop does NOT meet the definition of “Super Carrier”.
41 posted on
02/11/2008 6:20:03 PM PST by
Ronin
(Bushed out!!! Another tragic victim of BDS.)
To: Rikstir
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
