Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

£35m contract allows assembly of Navy Super Carriers
uk MoD ^ | 11 feb 08 | uk MoD

Posted on 02/11/2008 1:54:12 PM PST by Rikstir

The start of an investment project to modify the dockyard at Rosyth, in preparation for the assembly of the two Royal Navy super carriers was witnessed today, 11 February 2008, by Defence Secretary Des Browne.

The two 65,000 tonne aircraft carriers, HMS Queen Elizabeth and HMS Prince of Wales, are to be constructed in sections in shipyards at Portsmouth and Barrow-in-Furness, Glasgow, with final assembly at Babcock's Rosyth in Scotland.

Des Browne witnessed the signing of a £35m contract today by Babcock Engineering Services with Glasgow-based subcontractors Edmund Nuttall Limited to modify the docks in order to accommodate the building of the carriers and widen its direct entrance.

(Excerpt) Read more at mod.uk ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: british; cvf; navair; navy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last
To: Rikstir

Someone needs to tell the Brits that their cute little mini-flattop does NOT meet the definition of “Super Carrier”.


41 posted on 02/11/2008 6:20:03 PM PST by Ronin (Bushed out!!! Another tragic victim of BDS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ronin

A supercarrier is defined as a carrier of 75,000 tons displacement or more. It is possible that fully loaded, this new class will meet that definition.
However, advances in technology mean that a lot of weight will be saved, and these carriers will have the capabilities, though not the actual displacement of a supercarrier....


42 posted on 02/12/2008 4:46:21 AM PST by thundrey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Ronin

You wont want it in your battlegroups then will you?????

Thats fine by us, we can save the expenditure and have them patrol around Gib, or the Falklands, instead of acting as your right hand.


43 posted on 02/12/2008 8:28:25 AM PST by Rikstir
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: AxelPaulsenJr

About 2/3rds the size.


44 posted on 02/12/2008 8:31:49 AM PST by Non-Sequitur (Save Fredericksburg. Support CVBT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Tatze
Have the Brits ever had an angled deck?

They invented the angle deck.

45 posted on 02/12/2008 8:32:57 AM PST by Non-Sequitur (Save Fredericksburg. Support CVBT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Oztrich Boy
Victoria got two

The second one was rammed and sunk by HMS Camperdown off Lebanon in 1893.

46 posted on 02/12/2008 8:37:34 AM PST by Non-Sequitur (Save Fredericksburg. Support CVBT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
The second one was rammed and sunk by HMS Camperdown off Lebanon in 1893.

I thought it was Tunisia

47 posted on 02/12/2008 9:23:12 AM PST by Oztrich Boy (Never say yer sorry, mister. It's a sign of weakness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Rikstir

Nice.


48 posted on 02/12/2008 9:25:11 AM PST by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oztrich Boy; Non-Sequitur

And I was wrong, There are two Tripolis, and my brain confabulated the wrong one. Stupid Brain!


49 posted on 02/12/2008 9:26:49 AM PST by Oztrich Boy (Never say yer sorry, mister. It's a sign of weakness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Rikstir
I like the dual-islands concept. I think separating duties makes a lot of sense. Our Navy, on the other hand, is trying to get rid of islands altogether. Eventually, our carriers will end up looking like the abandoned U.S.S United States, which was completely devoid of any island at all.


50 posted on 02/12/2008 9:50:43 AM PST by DesScorp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DesScorp

looks cool. this must be an old design, they don’t look much like F35’s to me!

I ‘spose getting rid of an island or two will increase deck space, but there must be a reason for employing them at present.


51 posted on 02/12/2008 10:49:17 AM PST by Rikstir
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson