What would the people and the MSM be like if Hillary pulls a win out of her tushie? (Meaning something less than above board)
I don’t believe there would be rioting, but I do think that if the Dems were as upset with THEIR nominee as we are with ours, people would be paying attention. It would be a huge mess.
Black folks are really going to be hot when Clinton’s “steal” the election from them.
He’s right. Clintons have unlimited power and money. They can call up thousands of people and threaten them. They will get their way.
They fight dirty.
Obama is not corrupted like the Clintons.
He’s usually right about this stuff.”
Hmmm....maybe. I remember how he told us Hillary would not run for the Senate way back when....
In any event, by far the best case scenario for us is for the D’s to have a completely wild convention, where Obama dominates, yet the Clintons pull the rub out from under him, and he walks out in protest, vowing to run as a write in, thus bring down everythign! Wahhhhaaaaa
Hillary has the most ‘super delegates’. I have a feeling she’ll get the nomination without any trouble.
I’ll never understand why conservatives still listen to this douchebag.
I’m not sure, but John Edwards who owes his Senate victory to the Clinton smear, attack, and destroy machine was backed by Bill and Hillary Clinton to the hilt in the 1998 NC Senate race against Republican Lauch Faircloth who sat on the Senate Banking committee investigating the infamous Clinton Madison Guaranty Savings and Loan scandal. Edwards was handpicked to take out Faircloth, who was an elderly moderate Republican who used to be a Democrat. Edwards youth, Clinton and DNC backing, and targeted elimination of Clinton administration enemies put Hairdo in the Senate seat where the Clintons had an ally and an operative.
So when it comes to a close race and to whom Edwards’ valuable delegates will go, Hillary has history with Hairdo, and Hairdo can leverage her desperation to his political advantage, not as a running mate but as a possible US Attorney General or even Supreme Court Justice. Also, one must remember that despite the popularity of Obama, the entrenched DNC party machinery wants Hillary, just as the entrenched RNC party machinery wants McCain.
Dear Friends,
Last night I had the strangest dream. It was so real, so life-like and so vivid I woke up in a cold sweat. Let me describe it to you briefly...
1. Hillary wins the Democratic Party nomination for President of the United States
2. Naturally, she wants to choose as her running mate someone with a lot of knowledge and experience in government and foreign affairs, someone who is a seasoned campaigner who could bring a lot of strength to the ticket. Who better than Bill, her husband?!!!
3. Hill and Bill go on to win the election in November and the Democrats maintain control of the House and the Senate.
4. Hillary is sworn in as President on January 20, 2009. The next day, after all the inauguration parties are over, she calls a press conference to make an announcement: she is resigning as President!!! Bill, as the Vice President, immediately becomes President!!! This is all perfectly legal under the 22nd Amendment to the Constitution, for it states that no person "may be elected as president more than twice". Bill is not being elected for a third term but is merely serving out the remainder of Hillary's term --- all 4 years of it.
5. But wait! There's more! The following day Bill calls a press conference to make an announcement. He has chosen someone to fill the now vacant Vice President Position. Guess who he picks? Why, Hillary, of course!!!
Now you stay awake and let me get some sleep !!!!!!!
He’s usually right, but when he’s wrong, it’s often regarding the Clintons. For instance, he said Hillary would not run for NY Senate.
I don’t think Obama will get the Democratic nomination either.
The Clintons are scheming and manipulative and will do anything to get their way. Hillary considers herself the candidate of destiny.
The real question is: will Democrats elect her even after she screws Obama and hammers all the upper party members in to line?
Uh, Rush also stated that hillary would not be a Senator from New York.
I agree with him. No one cheats like the Clinton’s!
I truly do hope that Rush is right on this. Obama truly has the momentum presently going his way with no end in sight. This election is getting very ugly on both the Democratic and Republican sides, and true conservatism need not apply this time around, unfortunately. God truly help everyone get through the future of the U.S.! Long-term socialism truly needs to be stopped in its tracks throughout the U.S., and all conservative voters truly need to not stay at home on election day while also voting for true conservatives at every political level on November 4!
This year’s primaries have not been very kind to any pundit foolish enough to make predictions. Nevertheless, I’m going to go ahead and call the Democratic nomination race: Barack Obama will beat Hillary Clinton.
Why do I think that? The immediate reason is that we’ve just entered a month in which voters will see a series of headlines, like the one below, that all start with the phrase “Obama wins,” as Obama wins one caucus and primary contest after another. He now has the lead in the delegate count, and he is building an unstoppable momentum.
Hillary Clinton is hoping that, after a month of nothing but headlines proclaiming her losses, she can rely on a “firewall” of established support in Ohio, which votes in early March. Maybe—but then again, that was Rudy Giuliani’s strategy for Florida, and we saw how that turned out. After a month of headlines proclaiming victories by other candidates, Giuliani’s Florida support evaporated.
Another reason I am predicting that Obama will win is that the left-leaning press has turned against the Clintons. We saw this after Obama’s first win, in Iowa. The moment Hillary Clinton was no longer “inevitable”—in fact, when it looked like she would be out of the race quickly—there was a palpable sigh of relief, as if pundits on the left were finally free to admit, to others and to themselves, that they hate her.
In yesterday’s New York Times, for example, Frank Rich characterizes a Clinton attack on Obama as “a lie, and a bigoted lie at that” and dismisses Hillary as a candidate “crippled by poll-tested corporate packaging that markets her as a synthetic product leeched of most human qualities.”
Meanwhile, just to make things more fun for those of us on the right, the civil war in the Democratic Party is spilling over onto the editorial pages of the New York Times, with Paul Krugman rather implausibly accusing Obama supporters of waging a Nixon-esque campaign of “hate.” And yes, the comparison to Nixon—the Beelzebub of leftist mythology—comes from Krugman himself.
Oh well, I guess we have to have some entertainment to compensate for the depressing spectacle, on the Republican side, of a choice between John McCain and Mike Huckabee.
“Obama Wins in Maine; Clinton Replaces Her Campaign Manager,” Katharine Q. Seelye, New York Times, February 11
Senator Barack Obama racked up his fourth decisive victory this weekend, winning the Maine caucuses on Sunday, as Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton replaced her campaign manager and longtime aide in the biggest shakeup of her campaign to date….
Rush was wrong when he said that the Beast wouldn’t run for NY Senator.
I love him but he’s been wrong before.
McCain will destroy the party from within and no recovery....so at this point Id have to root for Obama because the Clinton machine will destroy his pres. We can re-group.
God help us.
I think he's wrong here. Anyway I bookmarked this thread for future reference.
wrong.
rush said that hillary was
not
running for the u.s. senate in 2000.