Posted on 02/09/2008 5:10:14 PM PST by george76
Hi george. Been away from the computer awhile. Glad to see your pings when I returned. Did you see this one?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1968193/posts
Hi george. Been away from the computer awhile. Glad to see your pings when I returned. Did you see this one?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1968193/posts
That part is true to some degree. But she appealed to sick feminists as well.
I’m pretty sure Chelsea is an adult. She is a willing participant in the Clinton crime family.
I think the Chelsea comment was disgusting. If I were Senator clinton I wouldn’t go on that network either.
Thanks.
Glad that you are back.
What is old is new again ?
Hillary’s people...
Where’s the apology for Juanita?
What about Juanita’s apology?
More to the point, slang is moving on. It was a tasteless thing to say, but only in the sense that there are some words an adult shouldn’t use in mixed company (and a TV broadcast that children are watching counts) that are OK in private conversation.
However, Schuster wasn’t making a sexual claim. The current slang for putting a whore to work isn’t “pimp out”, its “turn out”. If Schuster had said the Clintons were “turning out Chelsea”, then yes that would be an offensive accusation.
What’s interesting that slang moves on for other words too. Reporters are quick to say that a politician is “pandering”, and the other day the Clinton campaign sent out a “flip flop pander alert” about Obama.
Does anyone remember the original meaning of “pander”? Essentially it means to, well, pimp out.
pan·der (pndr)
intr.v. pan·dered, pan·der·ing, pan·ders
1. To act as a go-between or liaison in sexual intrigues; function as a procurer.
2. To cater to the lower tastes and desires of others or exploit their weaknesses...
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/pander
I can’t believe that guy said that. What if he had said that while the Bush girls were supporting their father in 2004. It was just unnessary and took attention away from the Clinton’s dying campaign. Sad that everyone took this hook, line and sinker.
Wasn’t she offering BJ when she was calling around trying to get votes for her mom?
“Folks, let’s admit that it was not a very tasteful comment.
We may despise Hillary and Bill but we ought not be nasty when it comes to Chelsea.”
Wait a minute.
The comment was not an attack on Chelsea but on her pimp mommy and daddy.
Absolutley it was not sexual. She is simply using her daughter to achieve the power she craves.
Hillary can only be a victim. /sarcasm
Regarding the pimp slur, can that be extrapolated?
As the only acknowledged child of the first black president, is his pimped daughter a Ho?
Very far down the road...but just wait until the general election; which ever one is the candidate, Clintoon or Obama, there will be a long list of forbidden words and phrases that will be taboo and woe the candidate, pundit, commentator, etc who touches the forbidden list.
Political Correctness will be the ruin of this country.
The point is that the remark wasn't about Chelsea..it was about those who were using her. A whore is a whore..a Pimp is the one who manages and uses her for personal profit. BTW is the First Amendment lost somewhere in the National Archives?
"The Final Jeopardy category was Unsuccessful Prostitution, the answer was 'This 2008 election campaign news gaffe transcended 2008 and made it into the all-time list. Gary is in third with $2200 -- 'Doesn't it seem as if Chelsea is sort of being pimped out in some weird sort of way?' -- IS CORRECT! What was your wager? $2200, putting you in the lead!"Thanks george76.
It used to be, now it’s up in Sandy Berger’s pantleg.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.