Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Economists Rethink Free Trade
Business Week ^ | January 31, 2008 | Jane Sasseen

Posted on 02/09/2008 4:21:41 PM PST by Halgr

Economists Rethink Free Trade It's no wholesale repudiation, to be sure, but something momentous is happening as doubts begin to creep in

by Jane Sasseen BW Magazine Over the Limit Do Bond Insurers Need CPR? Nothing Spreads Like Subprime News You Need to Know The Fed's Race Against Recession This Issue

February 11, 2008 Housing Meltdown Previous Issue Next Issue

Story Tools post a comment e-mail this story print this story order a reprint digg this save to del.icio.us

Many ordinary Americans have long been suspicious of free trade, seeing it as a destroyer of good-paying jobs. American economists, though, have told a different story. For them, free trade has been the great unmitigated good, the force that drives a country to shed unproductive industries, focus on what it does best, and create new, higher-skilled jobs that offer better pay than those that are lost. This support of free trade by the academic Establishment is a big reason why Presidents, be they Democrat or Republican, have for years pursued a free-trade agenda. The experts they consult have always told them that free trade was the best route to ever higher living standards.

[snip]

Yet concern is rising that the gains from free trade may increasingly be going to a small group at the top. For the vast majority of Americans, Dartmouth's Slaughter points out, income growth has all but disappeared in recent years. And it's not just the low-skilled who are getting slammed. Inflation-adjusted earnings have fallen in every educational category other than the 4% who hold doctorates or professional degrees.

[snip]

(Excerpt) Read more at businessweek.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Editorial; Front Page News
KEYWORDS: economy; freetrade; globalism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-183 next last
Its good to see some "rethinking" on an issue that has had an impact on the American Middle class.
1 posted on 02/09/2008 4:21:45 PM PST by Halgr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Halgr

Michael Reagan on Raegan style free trade. It ain’t what todays free traders would like us to believe.

http://www.townhall.com/columnists/MichaelReagan/2007/10/10/where%e2%80%99s_the_fire


2 posted on 02/09/2008 4:24:55 PM PST by cripplecreek (Duncan Hunter, Conservative excellence in action.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Halgr

My goodness, the Free Trade troika will have a collective stroke....

When 60% of rank and file GOP members (who were polled) say “no mas” to free trade, something is cooking.

No wonder all of those free trade bills are stalled in the Congress, the Dhimmis are not dumb enough to charge the hill of that much public disapproval of the matter.


3 posted on 02/09/2008 4:26:02 PM PST by padre35 (Conservative in Exile/ Isaiah 3.3/Cry havoc and let slip the RINOS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo; hedgetrimmer; jedward; processing please hold; calcowgirl

Hurrah for our side

;-)


4 posted on 02/09/2008 4:29:33 PM PST by Halgr (Once a Marine, always a Marine - Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Yes, this generation of politicians are giving us managed trade (badly managed at that) and calling it free. Purely Orwellian Newspeak. We don’t need government to give us free trade. We need governments to get the hell out of the way of free trade.


5 posted on 02/09/2008 4:30:32 PM PST by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Halgr
They could start by realizing that free trade ends where national security begins. If you don't have a free country, how can you have free trade? If you arm the Chinese through technology theft, and a lopsided trade agreement and they beat you, where does that leave you?

Something to re-think, indeed.

6 posted on 02/09/2008 4:30:38 PM PST by Lexinom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Exactamundo!


7 posted on 02/09/2008 4:32:27 PM PST by Lexinom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Absolutely.

Thanks for the link

;-)


8 posted on 02/09/2008 4:32:44 PM PST by Halgr (Once a Marine, always a Marine - Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Czar; joanie-f; B4Ranch; yorkie; Calpernia; hedgetrimmer
Ping to this article, which you'll enjoy reading.

Also, the following is related to the current and has already been posted, I believe:

A New Deal for Globalization
Kenneth F. Scheve and Matthew J. Slaughter
From Foreign Affairs, July/August 2007

9 posted on 02/09/2008 4:34:22 PM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Halgr

So, does it mean we don’t believe in market any longer? After all, no market works the way economics text books say.


10 posted on 02/09/2008 4:35:09 PM PST by paudio (Conservatism: like it or not, it's a fluid concept with many interpretations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Halgr

“What to do? Blinder argues for a big expansion of unemployment insurance and a major overhaul of the poorly performing Trade Adjustment Assistance program (TAA), which retrains manufacturing workers whose jobs disappeared. More vocational training and wage insurance, which would partially reimburse displaced workers who take new jobs at lower pay, also figure in his proposals. Both Clinton and Obama—and even Republican Senator John McCain—have similar ideas.”

Why the F*&* should we expand welfare when we can keep the high paying jobs by putting up trade and tax barriers to prevent outsourcing of middle and upper middle class professional jobs?

This genius would rather put people who were earning $75,000 prior to their job being offshored to Bangalore on long term welfare rather than penalize companies for outsourcing?


11 posted on 02/09/2008 4:35:19 PM PST by GOPGuide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Halgr; All

The Article mentions Slaughter....look who he works for and what he really thinks.

http://www.foreignaffairs.org/20070701faessay86403-p0/kenneth-f-scheve-matthew-j-slaughter/a-new-deal-for-globalization.html


12 posted on 02/09/2008 4:36:33 PM PST by Halgr (Once a Marine, always a Marine - Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Halgr

Free trade is good for all economies...but we don’t have have “free” trade with the major players. We let their goods in for free, and they slap tariffs and other barriers on our goods and services. That ain’t free trade.... thats just sucker trade


13 posted on 02/09/2008 4:36:50 PM PST by StolarStorm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Halgr

Socialist economists with hidden agendas, constituencies to protect and really afraid of a real free market rethink free trade.


14 posted on 02/09/2008 4:37:24 PM PST by theBuckwheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

ping!


15 posted on 02/09/2008 4:37:33 PM PST by ovrtaxt (The GOP is no place for a nice Conservative like you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPGuide

Sounds like socialism to me???


16 posted on 02/09/2008 4:37:42 PM PST by Halgr (Once a Marine, always a Marine - Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Halgr

“Duh”.


17 posted on 02/09/2008 4:39:31 PM PST by Cringing Negativism Network (Draft: Condoleezza Rice for Vice President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WorkerbeeCitizen; 1COUNTER-MORTER-68

Ping


18 posted on 02/09/2008 4:40:11 PM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: padre35
This article includes a little more than a slam at "free trade":

"A CALL TO ACTION What to do? Blinder argues for a big expansion of unemployment insurance and a major overhaul of the poorly performing Trade Adjustment Assistance program (TAA), which retrains manufacturing workers whose jobs disappeared. More vocational training and wage insurance, which would partially reimburse displaced workers who take new jobs at lower pay, also figure in his proposals. Both Clinton and Obama—and even Republican Senator John McCain—have similar ideas.

That's not enough, says Slaughter. He sees a need for some form of income redistribution to spread the gains from free trade to more workers."

yitbos

19 posted on 02/09/2008 4:40:31 PM PST by bruinbirdman ("Those who control language control minds. - Ayn Rand")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Halgr
All the goodies are found in the last section of the article, A Call to Action.

Blinder mentions training/retraining(equality of opportunity) and then goes on to mention wage insurance(or wage insurance for senior workers), which leads into equality of outcome.

Then Slaughter mentions income redistribution and a "New Deal for Globalization", which are definitely equality of outcome.

20 posted on 02/09/2008 4:41:15 PM PST by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-183 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson