Skip to comments.
Firm: Ship's anchor cut Mideast Internet cable
CNN ^
| February 8, 2008
| Unknown
Posted on 02/08/2008 12:51:56 PM PST by decimon
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-67 next last
To: decimon
I guess he didn’t get the memo from Egypt a couple of days ago: “ix-nay on the anchor-ay”:
“Egypt’s transport ministry said footage recorded by onshore video cameras of the location of the cables showed no maritime traffic in the area when the cables were damaged.
“The ministry’s maritime transport committee reviewed footage covering the period of 12 hours before and 12 hours after the cables were cut and no ships sailed the area,” a statement said.
“The area is also marked on maps as a no-go zone and it is therefore ruled out that the damage to the cables was caused by ships.”
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1964455/posts
It looks like Job One now is to confuse the issue of which cable any given person is talking about. Job Two is to get things fixed.
21
posted on
02/08/2008 1:24:18 PM PST
by
jiggyboy
(Ten per cent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
Comment #22 Removed by Moderator
To: Ken522
Now I heard from some really really reliable sources whose identity I cannot disclose that certain really quiet sneaky submarines were sent by the Great Satan to cut the cables and disrupt internet connections in India and Saudi Arabia in retaliation for the high price of oil ... yeah, that's the ticket!Big deal. I heard the same story before there were cables. ;-)
23
posted on
02/08/2008 1:25:39 PM PST
by
decimon
To: F15Eagle
“cable spanning Dubai and Oman was snapped February 1 by an abandoned six-ton ship anchor.”
You realy have to watch out for those ‘abandoned’ anchors wandering around.
24
posted on
02/08/2008 1:27:06 PM PST
by
DakoKid
To: jiggyboy
It looks like Job One now is to confuse the issue...You're doing a good job of that. This article references not maritime traffic but an abandoned anchor.
25
posted on
02/08/2008 1:27:49 PM PST
by
decimon
To: decimon
So we’re back to the bouncing six-ton anchor theory?
26
posted on
02/08/2008 1:30:36 PM PST
by
jiggyboy
(Ten per cent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
To: decimon
Oh, of course! A boat anchor. Yes.
'Scuse me...I need to put some more of these up on eBay.
27
posted on
02/08/2008 1:32:41 PM PST
by
Digital Sniper
(Hello, "Undocumented Immigrant." I'm an "Undocumented Border Patrol Agent.")
To: F15Eagle
If the anchor was abandoned, then it was most likely AFTER snagging a cable. I haven't read up on the details of all the severings, but I do know a little bit about phone cables...how they are run from shore [there are at least a couple of methods], how they are later then plowed or jetted in, etc.
It's dangerous to snag a modern fiber optic cable. There can be some extremely high voltages running alongside, with the "light" fibers, since over long distances, there must be boost stations to periodically re-invigorate the signal. Old copper wire wasn't like that.
Though I suppose in this case, just crossing the Persian Gulf(?), there need not be much voltage? The signal can go quite aways without needing a boost station. The trans-Pacific cables need multible boosting...
28
posted on
02/08/2008 1:33:08 PM PST
by
BlueDragon
(what a sad song it has become, no?)
To: Digital Sniper
"Hello Mideast?...come in...come in."
29
posted on
02/08/2008 1:36:37 PM PST
by
quark
Comment #30 Removed by Moderator
To: jiggyboy
So were back to the bouncing six-ton anchor theory?We? I did not propound any such theory.
31
posted on
02/08/2008 1:42:24 PM PST
by
decimon
To: decimon
32
posted on
02/08/2008 1:43:22 PM PST
by
MizSterious
(If it's Hillary v. McCain, I refuse to vote for EITHER liberal !)
To: BlueDragon
last I knew, Corning LEAF cables could go 3000 mi without regeneration. however, i’ve been out of the telecom bleeding edge for about ten years.
33
posted on
02/08/2008 1:44:32 PM PST
by
tired1
(responsibility without authority is slavery!)
To: MizSterious
Apparently the total is now up to 5...But that, apparently, has proved to not be so.
34
posted on
02/08/2008 1:46:21 PM PST
by
decimon
To: Martin Tell; thackney; SierraWasp; NormsRevenge; Marine_Uncle; blam; SunkenCiv
Dvorak had an item at Marketwatch that speculated on these incidents....
Using the Internet as a weapon
Commentary: Internet interruption in the Middle East looks fishy
*************************EXCERPT***********************
BERKELEY, Calif. (MarketWatch) --Nobody knows what caused the cut cables in the Mediterranean that interrupted Internet service to parts of the Middle East last week, but there are now conspiracy theories galore written by bloggers and pundits.
Some say it will benefit terrorists and Iran somehow. In fact, the cut cables -- originally blamed on ships dragging anchors -- look more like a ploy by some intelligence agency to disrupt Iranian commerce, specifically an emerging oil bourse that the Iranians have been quietly establishing and hoped to roll out fully in the next 60 days.
This concept seems a little farfetched until you look at the details which were provided to me by one of my readers, Martin Kuplens-Ewart who has been following the story from the outset. He notes: "there is a substantial event that has effectively been killed by the loss of connectivity: the launch of the Iranian Oil Bourse.
"A marketplace for oil, gas, and various petrochemicals, the Iranian Oil Bourse would trade exclusively in non-dollars and probably substantial negative impact to the U.S. economy and financial system. The bourse was scheduled for launch this week (between Feb. 1 and 11. With complete elimination of Internet connectivity to the country, this launch is now impossible and unlikely to be achievable before month's end (given the estimate 10-14 days for repairs to fiber-optic cables)."
To: MizSterious
To: decimon
That’s if we can trust some of this news coming out of that area. The bouncing anchor story, for one, sounds a little strange.
37
posted on
02/08/2008 1:49:37 PM PST
by
MizSterious
(If it's Hillary v. McCain, I refuse to vote for EITHER liberal !)
To: AU72
I still sayit was a weather baloon.
38
posted on
02/08/2008 1:52:13 PM PST
by
RobRoy
To: MizSterious
The bouncing anchor story, for one, sounds a little strange.I haven't seen any story about a bouncing anchor.
39
posted on
02/08/2008 1:57:44 PM PST
by
decimon
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Dvorak’s conjecture can make sense if disrupting the Iranian oil bourse for two weeks makes sense. But that would give incentive to the Iranians to create alternate communications and does nothing to explain the other cable disruptions.
40
posted on
02/08/2008 2:00:49 PM PST
by
decimon
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-67 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson