Now is the Winter of Our Conservative Discontent

American Thinker ^ | February 07, 2008 | Thomas Lifson

[neverdem]

The prospect of John McCain as Republican nominee is inspiring sometimes angry resistance from millions of conservative stalwarts. Ann Coulter's famous support for Hillary Clinton  threatens to spark a wave of conservative "suicide voters"  if the Arizona Senator gets the nomination.

Other Republicans, variously called insiders, party pros, elitists and worse, blithely assure us the alienated base will come around in the end and vote for McCain and the GOP ticket, particularly if Hillary Clinton is the alternative.

Assuming McCain gets the nomination, I am not so sure. It could go either way.

Anger at McCain

Anger has been a consistent theme for 7 years on the left, beginning with outrage over Bush's electoral victory. Anger now has now become a familiar conservative motif, as well. McCain has provoked a profound animus from conservatives ranging from Rush Limbaugh and Thomas Sowell on down to the posters at numerous conservative blogs, emailers to this site, and callers to talk radio. McCain's Legislative sins prominently include McCain-Feingold, McCain-Lieberman, and McCain-Kennedy. All three feel to principled conservatives like monstrous betrayals -- liberalism that can only make things worse.

Then there is the obvious relish with which McCain sometimes sticks it to the disaffected voters to his right, as with his comment on a conference call to bloggers likening ANWR and the Grand Canyon as places we shouldn't drill for oil. The conservative base of the GOP has been dissed by the Senator on multiple occasions like this, in ways big and small.

To be fair, this in-your-face attitude has caused trouble for him on the left as well, witness his remark that we could have troops in Iraq for one hundred years and that would be "fine", in response to a hostile questioner in New Hampshire. This man enjoys challenging, sometimes baiting, his opponents, and when provoked may still retain a little of the propensity for getting himself in trouble that he displayed at Annapolis and as a fighter jockey.

Discontent

McCain's nose-thumbing stings all the worse for conservatives because it has been unusually tough to be a conservative of late. The loss of Congressional majorities still stings. President Bush has been no Reagan, except in his commitment to victory in Iraq and Afghanistan. Bush's fiscal profligacy has been dispiriting, as has his tendency to accommodate Ted Kennedy and other liberals.

Conservatives feel they need a champion. Instead of an inspiring new conservative leader, they have now pinned their hopes on Mitt Romney, who has attracted several major conservative endorsements since McCain became the man to beat. Governor Romney is a fine and able man, but his evolving positions and managerial speaking style do not recommend him for the role of ideological champion.

All in all, it is more than reasonable for conservatives to feel somewhat abandoned. They are unappreciated by McCain, and, so it almost seems, by the party that may be about to nominate him.

Atmospherics

Relentless media portrayals of the supposed misery inflicted on America by Bush and other conservatives also have taken their toll. Conservatives ably critique mainstream media coverage of the economy, Iraq, immigration, and other issues, but these words rarely reach beyond the world of the internet and talk radio. The vaster reach of the liberal media has created an atmosphere in which conservatives have to fight against a media-spawned general public impression that having the GOP run the White House or Congress was a very bad idea.

In the major media, the American economy is never celebrated as a success (though Bush's track record has been good), but always seen as a problem. The now-classic portrayal of coffin makers in Iraq suffering as the carnage has declined crystallizes beyond satire the media's gloom-mongering. Iraq was a horrendous disaster, and then it just vanished from consideration as the Surge turned things around. The media have been telling Americans that things are in terrible shape for seven years, thanks to Bush and the conservatives, and too many people buy it because TV comedians joke about it. There are a lot of parties at which it is not much fun to be an open conservative, and not just in Berkeley.

Schadenfreude Season

The sole pleasure being a conservative now is enjoyment of Hillary Clinton's life-and-death struggle for the Democratic nomination. She expected a coronation and ran into Barack Obama's charisma, likeability and extraordinary appeal to those delighted at the prospect of finally having a black American occupy the nation's highest office. His race card has trumped her gender card.

She and Bill have already drawn down the family wealth and loaned the campaign five million dollars, while Obama is reported to have raised three million dollars yesterday alone, raising the question of how far will the Clintons go in financing her campaign, against Obama, the candidate with all the momentum Hillary was known as a tightwad, so this kind of financial drain must be painful indeed for her, and persuading Bill to cough up the dough from his gigs in Dubai, Kazakhstan and other erstwhile friendly states may be no picnic.

If the Democrats' contest lasts all the way to the convention floor, it will get down and dirty, possibly with Hillary needing to pressure super delegates and make a stink about seating the Florida and Michigan delegations, if she is to win. Americans, including conservatives, will be treated to the spectacle of Hillary Hardball being played on Obama, and Obama fighting back. This will serve as a handy reminder to the conservative base of how bad either Democrat alternative to McCain would be. 

How Many Conservatives Can McCain Lure Back?

Inevitably at least some conservatives will cool their passions between now and November and rally to defeat Clinton or Obama, unless Senator McCain further aggravates and alienates them during the campaign (a possibility that cannot be ruled out). But McCain potentially could expand the number by addressing both the substantive and emotional problems conservatives have had with his behavior. He must win both hearts and minds, to adopt a Vietnam era slogan. Today's scheduled speech by McCain at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) offers an opportunity to begin mending fences. 

On a substantive level, he has to emphasize the part of his record that is consistent with at bedrock conservative values, showing how very different he would be from the Democrats' nominee. His strongest case is in national defense, but he could leverage his record on fiscal restraint into a push for lower taxes while shrinking the deficit. McCain has a career rating of over 80% from the ACU, while his democratic opponents have approximately 10% ratings

Perhaps his biggest opportunity to neutralize previous damage is with immigration reform. He needs to make it clear that he no longer favors rewarding illegal residents with permanent residence or a shot at American citizenship, unless they pay some penalty and get back in line in some symbolically and substantively important way. If he is able backtrack and admit doing so, a door opens for him. 

McCain is almost uniquely endowed with the ability to speak meaningfully about the obligations of citizenship, having so spectacularly sacrificed personally in serving his nation. A ringing defense of the heroic service of immigrant soldiers who have earned American citizenship, along with a plan to reform naturalization processes to make it possible for legal immigration to better meet America's needs and interests, could turn the issue around.

In the realm of feelings, some form of direct or indirect apology can be a useful tool of reconciliation in normal group dynamics. But Senator McCain may not have it in him to apologize per se. But if in some form he acknowledges, directly or indirectly, that he regrets the stress he has created for conservatives, that would help his case on a purely emotional level. He might be able to get some mileage out of agreeing to hear out critics of global warming theory, or acknowledging problems with campaign finance reform, or consider reversing himself on ANWR drilling, painting a picture of a man who can learn from his mistakes.

At the same time, he has to avoid giving centrist voters the impression that he is knuckling under to the hard right. A tricky feat for even a sensitive feeling sort of guy, much less for a man who prides himself on speaking his mind and has a temper. A   bungled attempt could aggravate matters.

Mitt Romney at this moment is unlikley to be able to pick up momentum and secure the nomination, of course. Only time will tell.

But John McCain seems poorly equipped by temperament to winning over the hearts of alienated conservatives. Which creates the need, if not yet a supply, of conservative leaders willing to help nudge him along toward reconciliation by going a few baby steps forward themselves, in the interest of keeping the United States on the course to victory in Iraq and in the War on Terror.

Thomas Lifson is the editor and publisher of American Thinker.

[Dr.Zoidberg]

the alienated base will come around in the end and vote for McCain and the GOP ticket, particularly if Hillary Clinton is the alternative.

This right here is the problem. The GOP has no reason to think they don't have all the little republicans chained up on the plantation ready to so whatever they are told.

And for a lot of them they are absolutely right. "The Party" owns a great number of voters and they know it.

So, as long as you let the GOP slave-masters crack that whip and you jump to, they will keep pushing garbage like McLoon down your throats and you'll keep swallowing, because "you have no where else to go."

As for me, I'm tired of it and will have nothing more to do with a party that takes me granted and refuses to EARN my vote.

[FreePoster]

I wholeheartedly agree with your opinion of McCain.

I just see some chance that fewer people would die in places like Iraq and Afghanistan (maybe even NYC or LA) under a McCain administration than under Clinton or Obama. So only for this, as a matter of conscience, I might have to close my eyes and vote for him. But I don’t think it will matter. I can’t imagine a presidential candidate winning with such lukewarm-at-best support from his own party. Just look at Bush in 1992, and even he had much stronger support than McCain will ever have.

[Politicalmom]

Thanks. :)

[sanchmo]

Well then, I won’t vote for a conservative this election. Instead, I will vote for the candidate who has the best chance
* to prevent us from surrender in Iraq and in the War on Terror, and may even lead us to victory;
* to prevent the federal budget from ballooning to heights from which we can never recover;
* to prevent 2-3 more Ruth Baider Ginsburgs from being appointed to the Supreme Court;
* to prevent universal, government controlled healthcare.

Burn me at the stake if that is heresy against conservatism.

[JasonC]

I think practical politics is set by reality, and not by ridiculous fantasies. If you can't name a single pol you support, who the heck cares what you think about politics?

[FreePoster]

they will keep pushing garbage like McLoon down your throats

For what it's worth, it won't win them elections.

[JasonC]

I deny it. One, I don't think it will come to that. Two, we would still need conservative governing so we would still get conservative governing. Liberal policies don't work. That, and not who votes for them, is why they should be opposed and can't "take" in the long run. Conservative policies do work. That is why the people will come back to them in time.

There are no final anythings in American politics. I utterly reject your defeatism.

[JasonC]

Hardly. I have however found on this site in the last several months that ridiculous ideologues are ready to sling charges of traitor at every leader active in my entire life, including the most conservative. And that simply makes them our very own moonbats.

[RavenATB]

“I just see some chance that fewer people would die in places like Iraq and Afghanistan (maybe even NYC or LA) under a McCain administration than under Clinton or Obama”

First, let me say that as a recently retired officer with 26 years in service, that I completely support the GWOT, and our service members who sacrifice so much for our freedom.

That being said, I completely oppose spending another American life, another limb, or another dollar on Iraq if we’re not going to protect the nation our heroes are longing to return to. If all we’re going to do is allow our nation to be taken over from within, the least we can do is allow our troops to come home, today, so they can enjoy what few months of freedom and opportunity remain before the hoards of illegals destroy us.

[Dr.Zoidberg]

For what it's worth, it won't win them elections.

It will as long the whipped little republicans keep crawling back and licking the masters boots.

Until the GOP is handed an absolutely crushing defeat, they will learn nothing and will keep rolling with semi-socialists and liberal-light until they think the time is right to completely abandon the camouflage of "conservatism" and proceed as open socialists.

There is less than a dimes worth of difference in the majority of policies of the front runners, less than a nickle, but as long as there's an (R) after one of those names you'll bloody well be expected to vote for it!

[RavenATB]

“If you can’t name a single pol you support, who the heck cares what you think about politics?”

I’m arguing our national survival, and you’re trying to play politics. Have at it, and enjoy what little time you have left to play your childish games. I suggest your time would be better spent learning to Spanish, so you’ll be able to participate in your beloved political games two decades from now, when the illegals and their spawn will be the largest single voting block in the US.

[ARE SOLE]

Where has McCain gone wrong on the war on terror ? (including Iraq)

I'll tell you where but I doubt it will do much good. How the hell do you fight a war while leaving your perimeter wide open. See Mexico.

How can you fight a war while offering amnesty to millions of people illegally in the country including Al Queda moles?

[SoConPubbie]

I just cannot believe all of this junk.

We went through this already with Rudy.

John “Traitor to the Conservative Cause” McAmnesty is just the slightest bit better than Rudy and Rudy was not fit to be a dogcatcher much less the Leader of the Free World.

I would not want McCrazy with his growing left-wing bent anywhere near a seat of power.

[FreePoster]

Bush had the same policy on that subject.

This is largely why and how he, as head of the party, chopped himself off the GOP, leaving it headless, fractured, and in the position we're in now.

Disrespecting various elements of the party, pro-life, border enforcement, etc., by calling them "single issue" fanatics is not going to put the party back together.

[ARE SOLE]

So you value McCrazys judgement? John McCrazy says Hillary would make a good president, so why not vote for her?

[Doofer]

[KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle]

Here's my cash donation for Juan McCain, in the currency I know he most adores:

Tell him I suggested he not fritter it all away in one place.

[neverdem]

It's not over till it's over.

The GOP needs a brokered convention in 2008

Arise, Ye Favorite Sons

Down with the ship: Dobson to endorse Huckabee at last Stop McCain!

"Adoption of Islamic Sharia law in Britain Is Unavoidable", says Archbishop of Canterbury another nitwit cleric

Taking Down the NIE ("The NIE lied. Europe’s peacemakers cried.")

http://www.gurapossessky.com/news/parker/documents/07-0290bs.pdf

The brief by Gura et al. for Heller nee Parker is quite a well written read and chock full of history, besides knocking down all of the grabber's arguments.

From time to time, I’ll ping on noteworthy articles about politics, foreign and military affairs. FReepmail me if you want on or off my list.

[JasonC]

I don't want to put the party back together, particularly. Conservatives can if they want to, or not.

What I want is for the whining crybabies to grow up. I'll settle for them just making their own decision and letting the rest of us make ours.

[JasonC]

Oh no, I am going to be annihilated by "their spawn"! Horrors, it is the yellow peril all over again. Whatever shall I do? Where to turn in this calamitous extremity? Why, to a pack of crybabies who not only can't elect a dogcatcher, but can't name a single candidate for dogcatcher that they don't consider a traitor - of course! That's just the ticket.