Posted on 02/07/2008 7:17:56 PM PST by pinochet
It does not matter.
The real question is: Can you trust Hillary with nukes?
McQueeg will not be getting anywhere near the “football”.
What a problem solving ideal. Do you think we could get mclame to got to Iran and meet with him, we could outfit McClame one of those white vest things and tell him when he pulled the cord he would get gum drops are something.
Well said, the stability of some of the posters on this site is far more problematic.......
Also
I can’t help suspecting that a few of the contributers also have allegiance to the Clinton underground.
Stupid post of the year nominee.
I guess the whiners just dont get it. We didnt have a good or serious conservative candidate in this race. Face the facts whiners, shut up and go find something productive to do. Your emotional outburst is classless, disgraceful and totally unproductive.
But what if we don't effin WANNA do somethin' effin productive? Huh? What then? Will McCain effin nuke us?
Hey, comon now, lets not go overboard here. We are only into February. It's a stupid post, yes, but I think we can top it.
It would be something to worry about only if an American President had ever unleashed military force against, say, a small religious group or church, burning more than a hundred people to death in their own home.
Sadly but not suprising this is what is happening on a number of FR threads.
Was McCain trustworthy while being held as a POW in VietNam.
think about it, please. He stayed a prisoner for his men even though he could have gotten out since his father was a bigwig in the Navy.
He has guts and determination and good sense.
Velly funny. I rike you style.
You forgot about Plan "R".
The dems will protray McInsane like Ripper
ping
LOL!
You’re right. With the recent flood of vanities, anything’s possible.
This might be February's entry.............
I fear for the nation if he’s in power. I can’t voye for someone who might explode someday and start a World War.
I will never vote for McCain—as things progress the people will see this as well. I predict he will carry only Arizona in the general election.
They will be playing “Happy Days are here again” when Hillary is sworn in. Her first day on the job will be the last happy day. It will be fun to see how she punishes those who turned on her. The Kennedys are going to be toast. Then we must set up a run to take the house back from the Democrats and Rinos, then the Senate, then after four years of problems we can get a real conservative in to fix things. I can hope—hope springs eternal.
LMAO ... you can’t be serious.
The MSM tried to paint both Nixon and Reagan as reckless, unstable, aggressive personalities.
In fact, it has NOT been under the presidents whom the MSM has portrayed as “reckless” when we suffer defeats abroad, rather it has been under presidents that appear weak like Johnson, Ford, Carter and Clinton.
The Vietnames communists knew they could play Johnson for a sucker. But when Nixon mined Haiphong and bombed Hanoi, that got their attention right quick.
Under Ford and Carter, communists and islamofascists made huge gains worldwide, especially in Southeast Asia, the Middle East, Central America and Africa. But when “reckless” Reagan came in, the tide changed.
We all know about the advance of islamofascism while Clinton diddled. The “cowboy” Bush has been another story, certainly since 9/11.
When we have a president whom the liberals whine about being “reckless” it is our enemies who will do the worrying.
I wouldn’t trust John McCain with the bottle of Geritol that he wolfs down each day.
At least he doesn’t have the Waterboard Option!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.