Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: STARWISE

Won’t happen until sometime after January 20, 2009.


3 posted on 02/06/2008 11:32:28 AM PST by Cletus.D.Yokel (McCain is unstable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Cletus.D.Yokel
Won’t happen until sometime after January 20, 2009.

Given how long the Bush administration dragged their feet (and still are dragging their feet) on a secure border), the terrorists have another 20 or 30 years of open borders.
10 posted on 02/06/2008 11:34:23 AM PST by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Cletus.D.Yokel
Won’t happen until sometime after January 20, 2009.

They need wait no longer than November 4, 2008.

11 posted on 02/06/2008 11:34:33 AM PST by South40 (Amnesty is a slap in the face to the USBP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Cletus.D.Yokel
True... a democratic government is most vulnerable following a transition of power. The closer to inauguration the greater the confusion... the greater the impact. Would almost be willing to bet the farm that the other shoe will drop during the summer of 2009.
28 posted on 02/06/2008 11:46:25 AM PST by AngryCapitalist (www.theangrycapitalist.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Cletus.D.Yokel

Hope you’re right.

But if the puppet masters have decided to trash the USA, as every indication is that they have . . . I figure their first volley will be a large scale diverse Jihadi attack.


38 posted on 02/06/2008 11:55:29 AM PST by Quix (GOD ALONE IS GOD; WORTHY; PAID THE PRICE; IS COMING AGAIN; KNOWS ALL; IS LOVING; IS ALTOGETHER GOOD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Cletus.D.Yokel
Won’t happen until sometime after January 20, 2009.

They would likely want to hit around the holidays at the end of the year. That way they get to hit Bush, but not give him enough time to formulate a good counter attack.

They can then do the middle east trick of offering to negotiate after a strike and before the counterstrike. A lot of Dems would say that they were just trying to hit back at the President who attacked them, and would oppose any serious response.

They would sell the new administration as a "new beginning" in diplomatic relations with the Islamic world through which we can resolve our differences and live together in peace.

76 posted on 02/06/2008 1:11:34 PM PST by untrained skeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Cletus.D.Yokel

You got that right. Iran and Syria are holding them off until the new president takes office, and they are hoping it will be a democrat. Bush proved what he would do if they attacked the US and they believe he will go after them if they attack now.


113 posted on 02/08/2008 6:56:09 AM PST by usslsm51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson