Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Massive Republican Voter Suppression in Southern Calilfornia!
News Talk Radio | 02-06-08 | PsyOp

Posted on 02/06/2008 9:01:01 AM PST by PsyOp

Reports are rolling into talk radio stations in San Diego about massive Republican vote suppression.

Thousands of Republican voters in San Diego and as far north as Los Angeles showed up to vote on Tuesday only to be told that they were registered "Non-Partisan". This meant that they could not vote for the Republican Primary candidates.

Non-Partisan (independent) voters in California can vote for Candidates in any other party, including the Democrat party, but are prohibited from voting in the Republican Primary unless they are registered as a Republican.

Rick Roberts [http://www.760kfmb.com] is currently reporting on this and has had hundreds of calls and thousands of e-mails from people who showed up to vote only to be told they were not registered as Republcans. Reports began rolling into the Roger Hedgecock show yesterday.

Several people have called in saying they witnessed this happening at polling place they worked at as volunteers. One gentleman stated that he believed at least 20% of the Republicans that showed up to vote were denied a Republican primary form because the roster showed them as "Non-Partisan".

The Republican Party in California has begun investigating this issue, but the mainstream media continues to report that Californias election "went smoothly".

It seems clear that someone or some group managed to tamper with the voter registration rolls. Either by direct access to the Registrars computer system, or by gaining access to voter information and then sending in registration cards in their name.

Southern California was projected to go heavily in favor in Mitt Romny.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: ca2008; california; keatingfive; primary; republican; romney; supertuesday; suppression; votefraud
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 461-464 next last
To: PsyOp; purpleraine
I guess I just don’t see how this happens in a Republican controlled environment.

Its easy to see how Dems do it at the national level when everyone votes in one location, but this is a Republican controlled site.

Were the people turned away really not registered as Republicans? Did they recently change the rules in California?

221 posted on 02/06/2008 11:10:09 AM PST by Dr._Joseph_Warren
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: daviscupper

It doesn’t matter in an election that’s conducted by district, not statewide. Ten votes in the conservative district counts just the same as ten thousand.

If this were a winner-take-all election, you’d have a point.


222 posted on 02/06/2008 11:12:08 AM PST by ArmstedFragg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies]

To: BurbankKarl

Exactly.


223 posted on 02/06/2008 11:13:11 AM PST by ArmstedFragg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies]

To: daviscupper; savedbygrace; ArmstedFragg

Yes, I was unclear what the article was saying. I expressed my confusion in comment #32 and then suggested that these Republicans may have been falsely labeled “independents” in #35. Seems that’s exactly what happened.

Something’s really screwed up here. If the results of yesterday’s California primary are allowed to stand, an uprising is entirely justified.


224 posted on 02/06/2008 11:13:16 AM PST by Theo (Global warming "scientists." Pro-evolution "scientists." They're both wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies]

To: Theo

Thank you for the clarification. Well done.


225 posted on 02/06/2008 11:16:19 AM PST by savedbygrace (SECURE THE BORDERS FIRST (I'M YELLING ON PURPOSE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 224 | View Replies]

To: PsyOp

Since the PRK now goes Democrat in every recent election, who cares? Its not like the ‘Pubbies are going to pick up any electors from that state...


226 posted on 02/06/2008 11:16:31 AM PST by Little Ray (Rudy Guiliani: If his wives can't trust him, why should we?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BurbankKarl

I disagree. It is an article, first published on FR. The OP is reporting on the facts, which he has heard from various sources.

The only part of the article that is an opinion is the next to last paragraph.


227 posted on 02/06/2008 11:17:48 AM PST by savedbygrace (SECURE THE BORDERS FIRST (I'M YELLING ON PURPOSE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies]

To: PsyOp

It is apparent that we need to have the Chavez and Castro
government monitor our next elections.


228 posted on 02/06/2008 11:22:17 AM PST by evangmlw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PsyOp
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zWKxwVZmomc

Maybe somebody already posted it, and maybe it is fake. Who knows these days?

Title is California Election Fraud, guy says he is Dem who registered as Republican so he could vote for Ron Paul.

229 posted on 02/06/2008 11:22:30 AM PST by Aliska
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: B Knotts
How would just the Romney voters be identified?
230 posted on 02/06/2008 11:26:57 AM PST by Osage Orange (MOLON LABE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Aliska
guy says he is Dem

A Democrat who doesn't think the rules against filming in a polling location applies to him. A Democrat who went to the polling station planning to film. And, a Democrat who thinks provisional ballots aren't counted. Oh yeah, I'm going to give a lot of weight to what he says.

231 posted on 02/06/2008 11:30:02 AM PST by ArmstedFragg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies]

To: Redcloak
What part of "If you're not registered as a Republican, then you're not a Republican" didn't they understand?!?

What part of "registered Republicans having their party affiliation changed without their knowledge" did you not understand? i.e. tampering with voter rolls...

I am all for closed primaries. You need to read more carefully before you pop off.

232 posted on 02/06/2008 11:35:28 AM PST by PsyOp (Truth in itself is rarely sufficient to make men act. - Clauswitz, On War, 1832.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies]

To: Osage Orange

They wouldn’t. But they could do this to suppress turnout in conservative areas, which hurts Romney and helps McCain.


233 posted on 02/06/2008 11:37:29 AM PST by B Knotts (If McCain wins, we lose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 230 | View Replies]

To: HamiltonJay

What the hell are you talking about? It says right there the problem was in San Diego County.


234 posted on 02/06/2008 11:42:46 AM PST by ElkGroveDan (I'm sick and tired of being sick and tired of all the politics in politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: B Knotts
But they could do this to suppress turnout in conservative areas, which hurts Romney and helps McCain.

The only way that'd work in a Congressional District based race (as this one was) would be to somehow find some sub-set of a given CD that's more conservative than others and change it. Done on a county-wide or area-wide basis, it'd have no effect on the outcome.

I'm still in the 'Registrar incompetence' column.

235 posted on 02/06/2008 11:45:19 AM PST by ArmstedFragg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies]

To: purpleraine
I will say I didn't, but then my sample ballot matched my paty registration.

I only checked to see if mine had the right name. I never even thought to check to see if it had the correct party designation next to my name, and I doubt most people did.

Furthermore, I didn't even pull my sample ballot out of the unread mail drawer until this last weekend. I had read the larger book with expanded information, but only filled out the sample ballot 2 days before.

236 posted on 02/06/2008 11:45:48 AM PST by PsyOp (Truth in itself is rarely sufficient to make men act. - Clauswitz, On War, 1832.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies]

To: PsyOp

I did see this happen to one fella at my polling place who said he was a dem and desired to vote for Obama

I sent a quick email this morning to some conservative friends and discovered that three of the six experienced this very problem yesterday!


237 posted on 02/06/2008 11:46:30 AM PST by roscommon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies]

To: BlueStateBlues
above his pay grade, or at least his honesty grade.

LOL!

238 posted on 02/06/2008 11:46:47 AM PST by PsyOp (Truth in itself is rarely sufficient to make men act. - Clauswitz, On War, 1832.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan

Re. your great tag line:

The first step is admitting you’re in politics......


239 posted on 02/06/2008 11:48:05 AM PST by ArmstedFragg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies]

To: ArmstedFragg
somehow find some sub-set of a given CD

They're called precincts.

240 posted on 02/06/2008 11:48:49 AM PST by B Knotts (If McCain wins, we lose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 461-464 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson