Skip to comments.
In about turn, U.S. says Iran may be able to make nukes by 2009
IMRA/Haaretz ^
| 2-8-08
| Amir Oren
Posted on 02/06/2008 5:20:44 AM PST by SJackson
The head of American intelligence said Tuesday that it is unclear whether Tehran has returned to its production of nuclear weapons in the past six months, and warned that Iran "would be technically capable of producing enough highly enriched uranium for a weapon" by the end of next year.
Speaking two months after an American intelligence report cast doubt on Tehran's nuclear ambitions, National Intelligence Director John Michael McConnell made his remarks during an appearance before the Senate Intelligence Committee to present an annual report on threats to the U.S.
A National Intelligence Estimate report released in December said that Iran halted its nuclear weapons development program in the fall of 2003.
"We remain concerned about Iran's intentions and assess with moderate-to-high confidence that Tehran at a minimum is keeping open the option to develop nuclear weapons," the report said.
"We assess with high confidence that Iran has the scientific, technical and industrial capacity eventually to produce nuclear weapons," it said, adding that the only realistic way to prevent Iran from producing such weapons was "an Iranian political decision to abandon a nuclear weapons objective."
(Excerpt) Read more at imra.org.il ...
TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Israel; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 200802; 2009; iran; iraniannukes; nie; proliferation
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
1
posted on
02/06/2008 5:20:46 AM PST
by
SJackson
To: SJackson
Too late. The ‘make nice with Iran’ train has already left the Foreign Policy Station.
2
posted on
02/06/2008 5:24:52 AM PST
by
AU72
To: SJackson
Something is seriously wrong with our intelligence community.
To: dennisw; Cachelot; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; Lent; GregB; ..
If you'd like to be on this middle east/political ping list, please FR mail me.
High Volume. Articles on Israel can also be found by clicking on the Topic or Keyword Israel. or WOT [War on Terror]
----------------------------
4
posted on
02/06/2008 5:28:18 AM PST
by
SJackson
(If 45 million children had lived, they'd be defending America, filling jobs, paying SS-Z. Miller)
To: SJackson
I’m sure Hillary will be able to handle this.
To: SJackson
Iranian Nukes - something for President O-Bomb-Us to deal with. “Oh please Mr. Mullah, don’t nuke Chicago, I’ll give you anything you want”.
6
posted on
02/06/2008 5:32:08 AM PST
by
reg45
To: Slapshot68
It’s called embedded *Socialism*
7
posted on
02/06/2008 5:32:28 AM PST
by
wolfcreek
(Powers that be will lie like Clintons and spend like drunken McCains to push their Globalist agenda.)
To: Slapshot68
Nothing is wrong since their goal is to subvert America
by continuing to leak vital US secrets to any reporter
they can find whom to brag about their own importance.
8
posted on
02/06/2008 5:32:43 AM PST
by
Diogenesis
(Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
To: SJackson
Watch. By the time we reach late October the estimate will be Iran will have nukes by the second week in December.
9
posted on
02/06/2008 5:36:24 AM PST
by
Non-Sequitur
(Save Fredericksburg. Support CVBT.)
To: SJackson
Would these guys PLEASE make up their minds.
Or just simply believe Mossad...
10
posted on
02/06/2008 5:46:37 AM PST
by
Victor
(If an expert says it can't be done, get another expert." -David Ben-Gurion, the first Prime Minister)
To: Slapshot68
"...Something is seriously wrong with our intelligence community..."
Yes.It was gutted or otherwise effectively dismantled from within by the Clintons, along with State, Justice, and a host of others...and all were kept from communicating with each other(remember the Gorelick Wall)...
11
posted on
02/06/2008 5:49:09 AM PST
by
Victor
(If an expert says it can't be done, get another expert." -David Ben-Gurion, the first Prime Minister)
To: SJackson
what a schock. i am so suprized..... yawn...
12
posted on
02/06/2008 5:58:46 AM PST
by
J40000
To: Slapshot68
I’ll second that sentiment. It seem that the intelligence community is agenda driven rather than objective. Dulles and Donovan are rolling in their graves.
13
posted on
02/06/2008 6:03:58 AM PST
by
pfflier
To: SJackson
So are we to just keep believing whatever the latest is, or what we want to believe, or old intel?
14
posted on
02/06/2008 6:05:45 AM PST
by
stuartcr
(Election year.....Who we gonna hate, in '08?)
To: SJackson
This is merely the first step towards invasion, or a pre-emptive strike by us or Israel.
15
posted on
02/06/2008 6:09:21 AM PST
by
ShadowAce
(Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
To: Slapshot68
Government intelligence community- often an oxymoron.
Keystone Cops, too much of the time.
16
posted on
02/06/2008 6:26:52 AM PST
by
flowerplough
( Allah, through his prophet and his followers, demands my submission and my obedience, or my death.)
To: SJackson
OK, so Iran nukes Washington DC ... what’s the down side?
17
posted on
02/06/2008 6:32:58 AM PST
by
NonValueAdded
(What Would Hobson Choose?)
To: flowerplough
I'm shocked, there is gambling going on here.
Here are your winnings, sir.
18
posted on
02/06/2008 6:42:14 AM PST
by
USS Alaska
(Nuke the terrorist savages - In Honor of Standing Wolf)
To: stuartcr
So are we to just keep believing whatever the latest is, or what we want to believe, or old intel? Recognize we don't really have a clue precisely what they're doing, but that they do have the ability to go nuclear in a relativily short period of time.
Recognize that the intelligence community won't provide the administration with a reason to act.
Prepare for the retaliation that will follow an Israeli strike.
19
posted on
02/06/2008 6:55:32 AM PST
by
SJackson
(If 45 million children had lived, they'd be defending America, filling jobs, paying SS-Z. Miller)
To: SJackson
It took under four years from the start of the Manhattan project until we broke New Mexico's will to fight by nuking it. Iran has a lot less to overcome since all the basic research has already been done, the design of atomic bombs is already known and they already have centrifuges. Anyone who comes up with a number over four years for a serious country with money to develop an atomic bomb is lying. Iran is a lot closer than that.
20
posted on
02/06/2008 6:57:23 AM PST
by
KarlInOhio
(Rattenschadenfreude: joy at a Democrat's pain, especially Hillary's pain caused by Obama.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson