I'm really torn on this. While I hate people searching my purse (what are they looking for?), I hate the fact that men's pockets aren't searched. Why should a woman be searched, but not a man? Men are primarily the violent ones, not women. I also would have no problem with a metal detector. So, as distasteful as this all is, you got a better idea?
I am a law abiding citizen, I DO NOT and will not conform to any rules that deny me the right to defend myself or others.
You may find the metal detectors a valid argument from your perspective, however, those of us who have been in confrontations and know what kind of animals are out there, will never submit to being disarmed.
Just to add another thought for you. I would defend your life in a heartbeat, even though you would not.
So.. I was wrong in assuming you were JOKING???
Women can be just as violent. Most children killed by a parent, are killed by the Mother.
***So, as distasteful as this all is, you got a better idea?***
Should the mall in my area institute such draconian regulations for shoppers, it would see the LAST of me. As is, there WERE a few places around town that I refused to visit because they adorned their store with a sign that read in part “Pursuant to Section 30.06....” that forbid CCW in their place of business. They were removed at all the places I cared about because business declined and/ or store owners were contacted and informed that it was believed they could be sued by citizens attacked in their premises when they forbid us to carry.
So, while I respect any businesses right to conduct business as they see fit, I hope they respect my right to take my money elsewhere.
***I hate the fact that men’s pockets aren’t searched.***
Reminds me of a famous movie: “Is that a gun in your pocket or are you just happy to see me?”
... Why should a woman be searched ...?
Damn good question. If you ever find a legitimate answer ("security" isn't one), be sure to pass it on to me.
Meanwhile ... see previous comments about self defense.