Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: xzins

She never said anything else.

Rush has made a cogent argument against voting for McCain. Basically having McCain as president would tie the hands of Republicans in Congress in fighting liberal bills because it would mean going against a Republican president.

Dennis Prager gave a very good argument why we would be would vote for McCain.

Hugh Hewitt denies the possibility that Romney could lose :)


42 posted on 02/05/2008 5:14:07 AM PST by Hugin (Mecca delenda est!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Hugin

“Dennis Prager gave a very good argument why we would be would vote for McCain.”

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

I am faced with some difficulty in determining the meaning of the above sentence.


68 posted on 02/05/2008 5:26:15 AM PST by RipSawyer (Does anyone still believe this is a free country?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

To: Hugin

>>>Rush has made a cogent argument against voting for McCain. Basically having McCain as president would tie the hands of Republicans in Congress in fighting liberal bills

Dumb argument really. The dem majority in both houses is likely to remain. But with no republican president with a veto pen to backstop them the republican minority won’t be able to accomplish much.

Of course it is very liberating to be in a hopeless impotent minority if thats what he means.


103 posted on 02/05/2008 5:37:33 AM PST by tlb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson