FoxNews: Laura Ingraham Declares She WILL Vote for John McCain if Her Candidate Loses

Ingraham on Fox ^ | 5 Feb 08 | Ingraham on Fox

[xzins]

She clearly stated:

I'm not one of those folks who will say that I won't vote for him.

She earlier said that she just didn't think this was the time to turn to party over to the Dole/Ford wing of the Republican Party.

She called McCain an amazing man, and that she deeply respected him.

[ishmac]

You have the power to preserve our nation and its honorable military, or you can throw these away by not doing everything you can to stop the destruction that the Democrats will bring. Yes, it IS that important. ... if you assure the return of the Clintons to the WH or an insufferable, America-hating vacuum, then don’t bellyache to me about how you didn’t have a Republican perfect enough to meet your exacting specifications.

Everyone is upset now, but I think in November, when folks are faced with the real possibility of a Hillary Presidency, they won't be so resolved to sit it out.

I despise McCain and thought his candidacy would be "mouldering in the grave" by now. Sadly, he looks headed for the nomination. Defending the country is crucial and that's about the only issue where I trust McCain. He will be markedly better than the democrat on this point. I too will seriously consider voting for McCain in the general, if that is the choice.

[Designer]

"..“nation building” as the reason for the WOT have forgotten that 3000.."

Not even close, Sir!

[xzins]

“Nation building” is a catch-phrase used by liberals in every liberal party world-wide.

If you don’t want to be identified with it, then I’d recommend you find a different phrase to explain what you mean.

Interesting, though, that the expression “nation building” as the reason for “Bush’s War” didn’t get tossed out until after the anti-war wackos at MoveOn began their anti-war protesting.

[Designer]

"“Nation building” is a catch-phrase used by liberals in every liberal party world-wide."

The libs are just p-o'ed that it is Bush who is doing it.

"..didn’t get tossed out until after the anti-war wackos at MoveOn began their anti-war protesting."

Actually, it is a lot older than that.

[restornu]

Laura on McCain
http://fetch.noxsolutions.com/laura/mp3/020408_mccain.mp3

[restornu]

Laura on McCain
http://fetch.noxsolutions.com/laura/mp3/020408_mccain.mp3

[rbmillerjr]

Did Ingraham really says this.

If so I’m done with her.
Rush, Levin, Hannity, holding out so far Dennis Miller is folding with Ingraham.

[Mad Dawgg]

I look at it this way,

If the General Election comes down to Hillary Clinton against John McCain it means I have to choose to vote for:

1. a lying-cheating-commie-loving-Kennedy-Backslapping-liberal-whore

Or

2. Hillary Clinton

I Choose:

D. None of the Above

[xzins]

True of both of them, MD. It was Romney who is on record saying he would out-liberal the Kennedys.

SO

If the General Election comes down to Hillary Clinton against WILLARD ROMNEY it means I have to choose to vote for:

1. a lying-cheating-commie-loving-Kennedy-Backslapping-liberal-whore

Or

2. Hillary Clinton

I Choose:

D. None of the Above

[Designer]

"Laura on McCain"

Thank you for that link.

Why can't we get Laura to run?

[JasonC]

Obama equals Iran with nukes. McCain equals Iran not getting nukes. Either goes wobbly on illegals. We aren't going to get our way on everything. Choosing to damn the country and get our way on nothing, including life and death issues for millions of innocents, because we are too busy stomping our feet and whining about not getting everything - is irresponsible, childish, and damnable.

[paul51]

Romney with all his faults is probably the last hope to slow the march

Slow the march? He's in lock step

[paul51]

Romney with all his faults is probably the last hope to slow the march

Oops. Sorry about that. In my fury, I read that to say Maccain, not Romney. Sorry. I actually agree with you.

[Hugin]

Rush’s point was that a Pub minority could block bad ideas coming from Hillary because they would be united, but would be split about the same ideas coming from McCain. An example would be Hillary-care in 1993. What do you think would happen if Pres. McCain announced he was working with Senator Clinton to pass a universal healthcare plan? All the Dems and half the Pubs would vote for it.

[Verbosus]

Well, Cindy.
What a difference a day makes.

I stand corrected.

With McCain’s little trick today in West Virginia, I believe I have changed my mind.
My apologies for jumping to the conclusion that even though McCain was not my first choice, at least he had one ethic - and that would be enough to vote for.
I was wrong.
Apparently, McCain doesn’t even have a single ethic.

[alarm rider]

I will not vote for McCain. I will not vote for a RINO, not now, not ever.

[windsorknot]

Conservatives are told to “suck it up” and vote for McCain. My response: bite me!

[Cindy]

Yes, ethics do seem to be missing.

Thank you Verbosus for your feedback.
I really do appreciate it.

[xzins]

I will not vote for a RINO, not now, not ever.

Then you can NOT vote for Romney, McCain, or Huckabee.

They are all rinos.

[alarm rider]

Bingo. Now you see my dilemma.