[ctdonath2]

I believe this is the SG’s brief: http://www.gurapossessky.com/news/parker/documents/07-290tsacUnitedStates.pdf

Read it. Amounts to “DC is completely wrong, but if you rule in favor of Mr. Heller then we’ll subsequently lose other prohibitions we like, so please just bury this case.”

[DoughtyOne]

It must argue that W., D.C. has no standing due to Congressional governance of the district, but some gun bans are reasoned.

Possible good point on one, absolutely terrible point on the other.

[org.whodat]

Read it. Amounts to “DC is completely wrong, but if you rule in favor of Mr. Heller then we’ll subsequently lose other prohibitions we like, so please just bury this case.”

Just thing how many trees you could have saved for jorge with that brief. :^)

[DoughtyOne]

I appologize. Thanks for the link. I appreciate it.

[jonascord]

The Supreme Court CAN'T affirm the written meaning of the Second Amendment! 20,000 local laws, Federal laws, the 1968 Kennedy Firearms Act, the 1934 Machine Gun Act, the BATF regulations, they all would lose standing like a fart in a hurricane!

They are going to use some flimsy excuse to ban scary guns, "sniper" guns, "criminal's" guns, "cop killer" guns, "unsafe" guns, "assault weapon" guns, "bullet hose" guns, "street sweeper" guns...