Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Anti-missile shield for spying on Russia, says Moscow
thenews.pl ^ | 04.02.2008

Posted on 02/04/2008 9:52:47 AM PST by lizol

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: FunkyZero

Russia had had an operational ABM system for many years. It’s however seldom mentioned in any news story regarding the construction of a US system. Nobody ever protests the “destabilizing” Russian system.

“The only other ICBM ABM system to reach production was the Soviet A-35 system. It was initially a single-layer exoatmospheric (outside the atmosphere) design, using the Galosh (SH-01/ABM-1) interceptor. It was deployed at four sites around Moscow in the early 1970s.

Originally intended to be a larger deployment, the system was downsized to the two sites allowed under the 1972 ABM treaty. It was upgraded in the 1980s to a two-layer system, the A-135. The Gorgon (SH-11/ABM-4) long-range missile was designed to handle intercepts outside the atmosphere, and the Gazelle (SH-08/ABM-3) short-range missile endoatmospheric intercepts that eluded Gorgon. ABM-3 was considered to be technologically equivalent to the United States Safeguard system of the 1970s”

November 29, 2004

TASS reports that the Russian Strategic Rocket Forces tested an ABM interceptor at its Sary-Shagan facility in Kazakhstan on Monday. A spokesman for the Strategic Rocket Forces told TASS.

The current Russian ABM system comprises 100 nuclear-armed interceptors and several radars stationed around Moscow.

http://www.armscontrolwonk.com/280/russian-abm-test


21 posted on 02/05/2008 2:55:40 AM PST by tlb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: stuartcr

Turning “on” a radar array and pointing it in any direction is noticable to those you are watching so it would be a very poor covert tool. We have other, better ways to peek at the Bear.


22 posted on 02/05/2008 9:01:03 AM PST by Camel Joe (liberal=socialist=royalist/imperialist pawn=enemy of Freedom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Camel Joe

Yes, but the base is a good cover for ‘contractors’ to use other devices for collecting data, and for coming and going. They would still use the missile equip for it’s original purpose.


23 posted on 02/05/2008 9:15:58 AM PST by stuartcr (Election year.....Who we gonna hate, in '08?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: stuartcr

I don’t believe our Polish friends care where we go or what we do so long as we share our observations with them. (They like Freedom)


24 posted on 02/07/2008 7:07:22 AM PST by Camel Joe (liberal=socialist=royalist/imperialist pawn=enemy of Freedom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Camel Joe

That’s pretty much the way it works with most host countries. The coming and going cover, is mostly for nosy civilians and non-host observers.


25 posted on 02/07/2008 9:34:45 AM PST by stuartcr (Election year.....Who we gonna hate, in '08?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson