If we don’t reciprocate - by conducting targeted assassinations of enemy leaders — we are NOT determined to win this war between the barbarians of militant Islam and the western civilizations...
Attempting to travel the “moral path” will lead to the destruction of moral society...
The militant Islamists MUST be delivered the maximum level of destruction, with no place to hide..
I believe actually it is the moral path, because this is self-defense - civilized nations defending themselves against terrorists who have declared and waged war, both in word and deed, for about the past 35 years. The strategy should be simple, call it targeted assassinations if you like, find him, kill him; they started it, we must finish it.
It was a stupid move driven by their hatred and misogyny. She was representing their interests better than they could have themselves by making Pervie’s like miserable. Had she succeeded in toppling him, it would have created an al-Q shaped vacuum in Paki leadership.
Somebody ought to write an opera about the downfall of Bhutto. It had an element of fatalism that would be perfect for melodrama.
.
NEVER FORGET
.
It may well be that...
the future of the entire human race...
may well hinge on our finally,
during this new 21st Century of ours,
.
...freeing all the women of the world...
...into being all that they already are in GOD’s Eyes...
...and all that they can be while here on the Earth..?
.
NEVER FORGET
.
Why conduct targeted assassinations and take the low road when we could avoid it by killing them all and letting God sort them out. I'd love to Firebomb Waziristan and then send in General Sherman and company to walk the place in a line and kill anything left living or just test a neutron bomb to see if they really work as advertised. I I were elected I'd give that sh1t-hole of anarchy 24 hours to give me Osama's head on a platter and commence to exterminating the region until his head appeared or they were all neutralized. And then I'd ask the other mohammedan nations "Who wants to be next?"